Friction on bicycle wheels in uniform circular motion

AI Thread Summary
In uniform circular motion, the friction on the rear wheel acts forward while the front wheel experiences backward friction due to rolling resistance. When the handlebars are turned at an angle, both wheels contribute to centripetal acceleration by exerting outward force on the pavement. This interaction is essential for maintaining stability during the turn. The deformation of the tires at the contact patches allows the bike to follow a larger radius than it would without deformation. Understanding these friction dynamics is crucial for effective bicycle handling in turns.
onon99on99
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
On pedaling a bicycle along a straight line, the friction act forward on the rear wheel and act backward on the front wheel.

If I turn its handlebar so that the front wheel is at a certain angle (say theta) and pedal it in uniform circular motion, what would be the direction of the friction on both wheel?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The backward friction on the front tire is rolling resistance. The back tire also has rolling resistance, but the rider input generates sufficient torque to overcome the rolling resistance.

When the bike is leaned over and in a stable turn with the front tire turned inwards, both the front and rear tires contribute to centrpetal acceleration, by pushing outwards on the pavement, coexistant with the pavement pushing inwards on the tires. Part of this is due to deformation at the contact patches, which results in the tires following a path with a slightly larger radius than the path the bike would follow if there was no deformation.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top