Friction on on circular objects while rolling?

AI Thread Summary
Friction plays a crucial role in the motion of rolling circular objects, as it enforces the non-slip condition between the surface and the object. While static friction helps initiate rolling, it ultimately opposes the motion, leading to a gradual stop due to energy losses from deformation at the contact point. If friction were removed, the object would maintain its motion indefinitely, demonstrating that friction is not aiding in the forward movement but rather in maintaining rolling without slipping. The distinction between static and kinetic friction is important, as kinetic friction occurs when the object is sliding rather than rolling. Overall, friction is essential for rolling but ultimately contributes to the deceleration of the object.
prashantjha
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
friction on on circular objects while rolling??

i had a doubt about circular rolling objects..
it is true that friction opposes relative motion..but while doing so in a rolling wheel rolling forward,the friction also works in forward direction.so then my question is why does the wheel stops after a particular time.if friction is helping it move,then it should move till infinity if left undisturbed??
 
Physics news on Phys.org


friction is not helping it move, friction is helping it roll. without friction, the ball is unable to roll at all and will just slip down the slope.

also, the friction on the ball is not in the direction of movement but in the opposite direction, it is the friction on the ramp by the ball that is in the ball's direction of movement. so the friction on the ball is still going in the opposite direction and eventually stops the ball.
 


Friction is not helping it roll in any sense. If you magically removed friction halfway through the experiment, conservation of angular and linear momentum would mean the ball continues in exactly the same way as before (with the exception that it never slows down).

Friction initially influences the rolling motion by enforcing the non-slip condition v = rw. After this, it doesn't do anything but slow the ball down.
 


prashantjha said:
i had a doubt about circular rolling objects..
it is true that friction opposes relative motion
Rolling resistance opposes relative motion. This is due to the losses in deformation (compression) and restoration (expansion back to original shape) of the surfaces at and near the contact point.

Static friction opposes external forces.

Kinetic (sliding) friction opposes relative motion between surfaces, but in this case, an object is not truly rolling any more.
 
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top