Frictionless pulleys with unknown masses. ATTEMPTED SOLUTION INSIDE

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving two masses connected by a string over a frictionless pulley, with one mass on a table experiencing kinetic friction. The user attempts to calculate the tension in the string, the unknown mass, and the applied force on the 9kg mass, but encounters confusion due to the equations leading to cancellation. A response highlights that the problem lacks sufficient information, as the unknown mass can vary infinitely while still achieving the specified acceleration. It suggests that the third equation used is unnecessary and complicates the solution. Clarification of the problem statement is recommended for accurate assistance.
soccerdude28
Messages
12
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Two masses are connected by means of a string which passes over a light frictionless pulley. The coefficient of kinetic friction between the 9kg mass and the table is 0.25. The applied force on the 9kg mass is unknown and the acceleration of the unknown mass, m, is 1m.s^2 down. Calculate:
a. The magnitude of the tension in the string
b. The mass
c. The applied force, Fa, on the 9kg mass


Homework Equations


Ff=UkFn
Fnet=ma


The Attempt at a Solution


Alright so i started out with finding frictional force on the 9kg block. Fg=Fn
88.2=Fn
Ff=UkFn
88.2(0.25)
22.05N


Now i found the first equation of just the block with unknown mass
Fnet=ma
Fg-T=ma
9.8m-T=m
T=8.8m

Now second equation of just the 9kg mass
Fnet=ma
T-Fa-Ff=9(1)
T-22.05-Fa=9
T-Fa=31.05

Now the third equation of the full system
Fnet=ma
Fg+Ff+Fa=1(9+m)
9.8m-22.05-Fa=9+m
Fa=-31.05+8.8m

Now from the three equations, i subbed 1 into 2
So: 8.8m-Fa=31.05
Rearrange
8.8m-31.05=Fa

Now i used "Substitution" for the third equation as well as the new one we just found
8.8m-31.05=-31.05+8.8m
and it basically just cancels each other out, which is why i am confused. What did i do wrong?
Thank you:)​
 
Physics news on Phys.org
i thought that with an attempted solution, people would be more willing to help, doesn't look like it
please guys, help me out
 
Without a picture, it appears your problem is missing some information, if I am understanding it correctly. It looks like you have a 9kg block on the rough table, connected by a string which wraps around a pulley at the edge of the table and connects to a hanging block of unknown mass m, which accelerates at 1m/s^2 downward. There is also an applied force Fa on the 9kg block, acting to the left. Is that correct? If so, the problem has an infinite number of solutions; I can make m as large as I want, and adjust Fa acordingly to give the proper acceleration of 1m/s^2. That third equation of the system (which I don't encourage using) is extraneous, and doesn't buy you anything. Please clarify the question.
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top