Full wave rectifier for piezoelectric stack

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the rectification of voltage produced by a piezoelectric stack using a full wave bridge rectifier. The user seeks guidance on calculating the required capacitor value for energy storage post-impact, acknowledging the variability in frequency, current, and voltage. Key insights include the recommendation to consider a single Schottky diode for efficiency, as well as the importance of understanding the nature of the output signal—whether it is true AC or a DC signal with AC components. The conversation emphasizes the need for empirical testing to determine the characteristics of the piezoelectric output.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of piezoelectric stack behavior and output characteristics
  • Knowledge of full wave bridge rectifier configurations
  • Familiarity with capacitor selection criteria based on voltage and energy storage
  • Experience with oscilloscope usage for signal analysis
NEXT STEPS
  • Research methods for calculating capacitor value based on energy requirements
  • Learn about Schottky diodes and their advantages in rectification applications
  • Investigate the differences between true AC signals and DC signals with AC components
  • Explore techniques for empirical testing of piezoelectric outputs under various impact conditions
USEFUL FOR

Engineers and researchers working with energy harvesting systems, particularly those utilizing piezoelectric materials, as well as electronics enthusiasts interested in rectification techniques and energy storage solutions.

lucy_b14
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
Hi

My project involves rectification of a voltage produced by a piezoelectric stack subjected to an impact. The voltage shall be rectified using a full wave bridge rectifier.

I aim to use a capacitor (in position of the smoothing capacitor) to store the energy harvested from the impact (simply because the device must fall from a certain height so it cannot be connected to any measuring equipment during its descent). The capacitor shall be disconnected following impact and connected to a volt meter so stored energy can be calculated.

My question is: does anyone have any suggestion as to how I can calculate required capacitor value? I have no idea of the frequency, current or voltage of the piezoelectric stack output, and these are likely to vary for different impacts.

I do know the voltage and current I require from the rectifier output - if that helps!

Any help would be greatly appreciated

Thanks

L
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
The biger the capacitor the more you can store.
 
capacitors are rated for voltage, so you'll need to know the maximum rectified voltage and maybe go a % higher for a safety margin. and you'll need to know the maximum energy output of the stack (or maximum signal applied if it's less than the stack capacity) to choose the total farads. you can use multiple caps in parallel if necessary.

edit: could it be that this is a system identification problem and that you'll have to do some lab work and analysis before you get down to designing the test instrument ? that's just the way it goes sometimes, you've got a black box and you've got to figure out how it works.
 
Last edited:
lucy_b14 said:
Hi

My project involves rectification of a voltage produced by a piezoelectric stack subjected to an impact. The voltage shall be rectified using a full wave bridge rectifier.

I aim to use a capacitor (in position of the smoothing capacitor) to store the energy harvested from the impact (simply because the device must fall from a certain height so it cannot be connected to any measuring equipment during its descent). The capacitor shall be disconnected following impact and connected to a volt meter so stored energy can be calculated.

My question is: does anyone have any suggestion as to how I can calculate required capacitor value? I have no idea of the frequency, current or voltage of the piezoelectric stack output, and these are likely to vary for different impacts.

I do know the voltage and current I require from the rectifier output - if that helps!

Any help would be greatly appreciated

Thanks

L

Don't use a full-wave rectifying bridge. That would be an error in either the project definition, or in your interpretation of the project definition.

Tell me why I make that statement. And tell me what kind of *single* diode you should use in this project, and why.
 
I'm afraid I can't work out what you're getting at. Having tested the piezo stack using an oscilloscope, it clearly shows an AC signal when an impact is applied. As far as I can tell, the only way to extract maximum available power is to rectify the output.

Please let me know if I'm getting confused here :)

Thanks
 
lucy_b14 said:
I'm afraid I can't work out what you're getting at. Having tested the piezo stack using an oscilloscope, it clearly shows an AC signal when an impact is applied. As far as I can tell, the only way to extract maximum available power is to rectify the output.

Please let me know if I'm getting confused here :)

Thanks

Well, if it's truly an AC output, with significant power in the negative excursions, then okay, a full-wave bridge might be justified. I'd assumed that the main power was in the initial compression of the piezo stack, which would put the main power in the initial voltage spike. Having just one Schottky diode drop versus two seemed like a good increase in efficiency, depending on the voltage levels you are getting from your stack.
 
it is certainly a valid question whether it's a true AC signal with a zero-volt average, or a DC signal with AC components (which would probably be a reflection of vibrations/bounce from the impact)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K