- 4,426
- 327
what kind of fund stuff do you get to do as a nuclear engineer?
Last edited:
Nuclear engineers engage in complex thermo-mechanical analysis of nuclear fuel, utilizing finite element methods (FEM) and multiphysics models to simulate both normal and abnormal operating conditions. They develop specialized models to understand the physical and mechanical properties of fuel materials, conduct predictive analyses, and validate models through experiments. Additionally, they participate in seminars and conferences, sharing knowledge on nuclear technology, and are involved in the design and analysis of exotic nuclear systems, such as spacecraft propulsion systems. The role also includes monitoring fabrication processes and addressing unexpected failures through non-destructive testing (NDT) methods.
PREREQUISITESNuclear engineers, physics students, materials scientists, and professionals involved in energy systems and safety analysis will benefit from this discussion.
Danger said:One of the first steps was learning to spell his name...![]()
Doc Al said:But I can...![]()
Mallignamius said:Whew! I thought something happened to him. Don't do that!
Astronuc said:Mostly thermo-mechanical (numerical and highly non-linear) analysis of nuclear fuel under the normal steady-state and transient operating conditions, and not so normal conditions that hopefully will never happen except in special experiments.
Well, it's not plasma. We like to keep our fuel solid and dimensionally stable, but there is bounded chaos in the sense that it is stochastic. This is particularly challenging when trying to define the technical limit(s) of operating fuel and then operating as close to the technical limit without failing.Pythagorean said:Is this in any way related to chaos theory in plasmas? SOC systems and what not?
Or do both. There is a lot of numerical analysis in physics and engineering now, because we can't possible do experiments on all conceivable combinations of variables. So we build numerical models based on what limited experiments we can do, and then we try to predict/forecast what happens in a given situation. It's very satisfying to do a prediction beforehand and then have an experiment or actual situation do pretty much what the simulation predicted.Mallignamius said:Physics I think I would love... Programming I think I could handle.
Astronuc said:Or do both. There is a lot of numerical analysis in physics and engineering now, because we can't possible do experiments on all conceivable combinations of variables. So we build numerical models based on what limited experiments we can do, and then we try to predict/forecast what happens in a given situation. It's very satisfying to do a prediction beforehand and then have an experiment or actual situation do pretty much what the simulation predicted.![]()