A Functional Determinant of a system of differential operators?

Yellotherephysics
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
TL;DR Summary
When applying the stationary phase approximation for path integrals we need to calculate the determinant of an operator; but what can we do if this operator is itself a matrix (made out of operators!)
So in particular, how could the determinant of some general "operator" like

$$ \begin{pmatrix}
f(x) & \frac{d}{dx} \\ \frac{d}{dx} & g(x)
\end{pmatrix} $$

with appropriate boundary conditions (especially fixed BC), be computed? And assuming that it diverges, would it be valid in a stationary phase approximation context to divide by some reference operator such as

$$ \begin{pmatrix}
0 & \frac{d}{dx} \\ \frac{d}{dx} & 0
\end{pmatrix} $$

and use this value, for the quantum corrections to the classical path?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Thanks for linking, your notes look really good vanhees71!

Would this be a fair summary for the Heat-Kernel method (starting on page 93 of the linked notes)?
If we call the operator we're interested in H.
  1. Work out the propogator ## \langle x | exp(- H \theta) | x' \rangle ##
  2. Then get some kind of expression for ## \langle x | exp(- H \theta) | x \rangle ##
  3. Find the Heat-Kernel (a function of ##\theta##) by integrating over the coordinates
  4. Find the other Heat-Kernel thing, denoted by ##\tilde{H} ## (a function of the complex parameter ##\alpha##)
  5. Take the complex parameter ##\alpha## to zero, getting the trace of the log of H, which we can then relate to the determinant
Is this algorithm still safe to use if H is something like
\begin{pmatrix}

a(x) & \frac{d}{dx} & b(x) \\ \frac{d}{dx} & c(x) & d(x) \\ e(x) & f(x) & g(x)

\end{pmatrix}
In the notes ## \langle x | exp(- H \theta) | x' \rangle ## is turned into something concrete by integrating over the momentum identity, would I be able to do something similar with my matrix example?
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top