A Functional Determinant of a system of differential operators?

Yellotherephysics
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
TL;DR Summary
When applying the stationary phase approximation for path integrals we need to calculate the determinant of an operator; but what can we do if this operator is itself a matrix (made out of operators!)
So in particular, how could the determinant of some general "operator" like

$$ \begin{pmatrix}
f(x) & \frac{d}{dx} \\ \frac{d}{dx} & g(x)
\end{pmatrix} $$

with appropriate boundary conditions (especially fixed BC), be computed? And assuming that it diverges, would it be valid in a stationary phase approximation context to divide by some reference operator such as

$$ \begin{pmatrix}
0 & \frac{d}{dx} \\ \frac{d}{dx} & 0
\end{pmatrix} $$

and use this value, for the quantum corrections to the classical path?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Thanks for linking, your notes look really good vanhees71!

Would this be a fair summary for the Heat-Kernel method (starting on page 93 of the linked notes)?
If we call the operator we're interested in H.
  1. Work out the propogator ## \langle x | exp(- H \theta) | x' \rangle ##
  2. Then get some kind of expression for ## \langle x | exp(- H \theta) | x \rangle ##
  3. Find the Heat-Kernel (a function of ##\theta##) by integrating over the coordinates
  4. Find the other Heat-Kernel thing, denoted by ##\tilde{H} ## (a function of the complex parameter ##\alpha##)
  5. Take the complex parameter ##\alpha## to zero, getting the trace of the log of H, which we can then relate to the determinant
Is this algorithm still safe to use if H is something like
\begin{pmatrix}

a(x) & \frac{d}{dx} & b(x) \\ \frac{d}{dx} & c(x) & d(x) \\ e(x) & f(x) & g(x)

\end{pmatrix}
In the notes ## \langle x | exp(- H \theta) | x' \rangle ## is turned into something concrete by integrating over the momentum identity, would I be able to do something similar with my matrix example?
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top