Fundamental Forces Problem: Net Force from Gravity

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the net force acting on mass m1 from other masses using vector addition. The initial calculations for forces from m2, m3, and m4 were found to be incorrect due to improper handling of vector components. Participants emphasize the importance of splitting forces into their x and y components using trigonometric functions like cosine and sine, rather than simply adding them. Clarifications are made regarding the angles involved, particularly that the angle for the force from m3 to m1 is 45 degrees due to its diagonal position, but the total force's angle will differ. The final consensus suggests using arctan for angle calculations when dealing with multiple vectors, ensuring accurate results.
JoeyBob
Messages
256
Reaction score
29
Homework Statement
See attached
Relevant Equations
F=-Gm_1m_2/r^2
So what I did was find each of the forces the masses had on m1 using the above equation.

From m2 I found 19.975 in the negative i hat and for m4 i found 29.96 in the positive k hat direction using the above equation.

For m3 I used pythagorean theorem to calculate r, which was 3.25 (so r^2 was 10.58). I then used the above equation to get 9.987N. This force would act in the up direction, so I added it to my k hat to get 39.95 and to the left so I made it negative and added it to my i hat to get 29.96 in the negative i hat direction.

Then I squared and added the forces and square rooted them to get 49.937N, which is wrong. The answer is supposed to be 45.84.

I think I screwed up somewhere during the m3 part, but I am not sure how.
 

Attachments

  • Question.PNG
    Question.PNG
    6.9 KB · Views: 170
  • Like
Likes Delta2
Physics news on Phys.org
You need to split the force from m3 into components. You just need a little trigonometry for that. To add the whole amount to each of the x and y results from m2 and m4 is incorrect.
 
  • Like
Likes Delta2
Charles Link said:
You need to split the force from m3 into components. You just need a little trigonometry for that. To add the whole amount to each of the x and y results from m2 and m4 is incorrect.

So I divide it by 2 and add it to each component?
 
  • Like
Likes Delta2 and Charles Link
Charles Link said:
That is also not correct. You need to learn about vector addition.
See https://mathworld.wolfram.com/VectorAddition.html
Wait that doesn't really make sense to me. It gives me the right answer, but the next question is like the same thing but it asks for the angle and the angles isn't 45.
 

Attachments

  • Next Question.PNG
    Next Question.PNG
    9.1 KB · Views: 150
Splitting the vector into components usually involves taking ## \cos{\theta} ## and ## \sin{\theta } ##.
For your first problem, ## \cos (45)=\sin(45) ##.
 
Charles Link said:
Splitting the vector into components usually involves taking ## \cos{\theta} ## and ## \sin{\theta } ##.
For your first problem, ## \cos (45)=\sin(45) ##.
But how do we know the angle is 45? The second question asks for the angle and its the same type of problem and the angle is 46.79.
 
JoeyBob said:
But how do we know the angle is 45? The second question asks for the angle and its the same type of problem and the angle is 46.79.
The force acted along the line joining the m1 and m3.
 
  • #10
The force from m3 to m1 acts along the line connecting m3 and m1, that is the diagonal of square , so it makes angle 45 degrees. But this force is not the total force on m1, it is part of the total force. If you have understand that part about vector addition correctly, i think you can understand that the total force (which will be the vector addition of all those three forces) will have another angle.
 
  • Like
Likes JoeyBob
  • #11
Delta2 said:
The force from m3 to m1 acts along the line connecting m3 and m1, that is the diagonal of square , so it makes angle 45 degrees. But this force is not the total force on m1, it is part of the total force. If you have understand that part about vector addition correctly, i think you can understand that the total force (which will be the vector addition of all those three forces) will have another angle.

So if I wanted to find the angle for the total force from m1 to m4, I would divide the k hat vector number by the magnitude and take the arccos of this? But this gives me a number that's too high.
 
  • #12
Ehm but the total force from m1 to m4, is only that one force right? So you essentially take arccos(1) which is 0, i don't understand what high number you are talking about.
 
  • #13
perhaps you mean the force from m2 to m4?
 
  • #14
Delta2 said:
perhaps you mean the force from m2 to m4?

Angle the total force on m1 would make from the line from m1 to m4.
 
  • Like
Likes Delta2
  • #15
Yes well, i see now, you have to divide the total k hat by the magnitude of the total force and then take the arccos of that. The total k hat will be the sum of two components : one from m4 and one from the force from m2. I mean The k hat component of the force from m2.
 
  • Like
Likes JoeyBob
  • #16
er sorry i meant m3 instead of m2 in the above.
 
  • #17
Delta2 said:
Yes well, i see now, you have to divide the total k hat by the magnitude of the total force and then take the arccos of that. The total k hat will be the sum of two components : one from m4 and one from the force from m2. I mean The k hat component of the force from m2.
Thanks I got it. I suppose it would be faster to just use arctan if you have both vectors, though this wouldn't work with 3 vectors.
 
  • Like
Likes Delta2
  • #18
You can use arctan as well, you just have to take $$\arctan\frac{\text{total i hat component}}{\text{total k hat component}}$$ to find the angle that makes with the k hat.
 
  • Like
Likes JoeyBob

Similar threads

Replies
28
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
31
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
1K