Fundamental groups and homotopy type

quasar987
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
Messages
4,796
Reaction score
32
I know of the "result" that if two pointed spaces are homeomorphic, then the group homomorphism induced by such an homeomorphism if actually an isomorphism between the fundamental groups of these pointed spaces.

But is there a link between the fundamental groups of homotopy equivalent spaces?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Homotopy equivalences also induce isomorphisms. This is easy to show if they are homotopies relative to the basepoint, but not too much harder even if they're not.
 
a functor is something that atkes objkects to objects, takes maps betwen pairs of objects to similar maps, takes identities to identities, and takes compositions to compositions. hence it also takes inverses to inverses.

i.e. if ∏ is a functor from spaces to groups such as the fundamental group, and if f:X-->Y is a homeomorphism, that means there is a map g:Y-->X such that fg = idY and gf = idX are the identities on Y and X respectively.

Hence, since ∏ is a functor from top spaces to groups, then ∏(f) and ∏(g) are homomorphisms from ∏(f):∏(X)-->∏(Y), and ∏(g):∏(Y)-->∏(X), such that
∏(f)o∏(g) = ∏(fog) = ∏(idY) = id(∏(Y)), and similarly the other way.

Hence ∏(f) and ∏(g) are inverse homomorphisms of the groups ∏(Y) AND ∏(X), so those groups are isomorphic.

Now the fundamental group is a functor, so itab tkes homeomorphisms to isomorphisms of groups. But also the fundamental group is by tis very definition constant on homotopy classes of maps, hence also takes homotopy equivalences to isomorphisms.

so all this is ":trivial" from the category theoretic point of view. i.e., learn to think in terms of maps, not just objects, and these questions will become automatic to you.
 
Last edited:
I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
8K
Replies
13
Views
569
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
61
Views
5K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Back
Top