Fundamental reasoning:Electromagnetic Wave - Visible Light

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the nature of light produced by a heated filament in a bulb, clarifying that the light results from molecular vibrations rather than atomic transitions. It explains that electromagnetic radiation, including visible light, consists of oscillating electric and magnetic fields, but humans do not feel the electric field's effects due to a lack of net charge. The filament's heating causes charges to vibrate, generating a broad spectrum of light, which differs from the discrete lines seen in atomic transitions like those in a neon discharge tube. The continuous spectrum from incandescent bulbs is attributed to the thermal vibrations of the solid tungsten lattice. Overall, the conversation highlights the distinction between light production mechanisms in different light sources.
madhushala
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
The filament of a bulb when it gets heated to some threshold level generates the visible light.

My query:

1. Why is it called electromagnetic then? Here, if i understand correctly, the waves are produced by the energy emitted by the transition of the electrons between various orbits of the metal filament. So where comes the magnetic field?

2. When light rays propogate then it being an electromagnetic ray, has electric and magnetic fields pulasating perpendicular to each other. Why is it that we feel no effect of the electric field at all? Is it beacuse the field strength is very less?

Please correct my logic if there is some flaw in reasoning.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
madhushala said:
The filament of a bulb when it gets heated to some threshold level generates the visible light.

My query:

1. Why is it called electromagnetic then? Here, if i understand correctly, the waves are produced by the energy emitted by the transition of the electrons between various orbits of the metal filament. So where comes the magnetic field?

Light produced by such filament does not come from an 'atomic transition'. It came from molecular vibration. If I have a bunch of charges and I make them oscillate up and down, I can create light. No atomic transition there, and not even the presence of atoms!

We call it "electromagnetic radiation" because it contains electric and magnetic field"

2. When light rays propogate then it being an electromagnetic ray, has electric and magnetic fields pulasating perpendicular to each other. Why is it that we feel no effect of the electric field at all? Is it beacuse the field strength is very less?

Please correct my logic if there is some flaw in reasoning.

"We" feel no effect because "we" do not normally have a net charge or net magnetic moment that is appreciable enough. However, if you send such EM radiation to a bunch of charges, you can certainly affect it. That is who most particle accelerator works.

Zz.
 
ZapperZ said:
Light produced by such filament does not come from an 'atomic transition'. It came from molecular vibration. If I have a bunch of charges and I make them oscillate up and down, I can create light. No atomic transition there, and not even the presence of atoms!

Hi zapper, Thanks!

However for the quote above regarding how light is produced in the bulb: http://home.howstuffworks.com/light-bulb.htm

. "An atom's electrons have different levels of energy, depending on several factors, including their speed and distance from the nucleus. Electrons of different energy levels occupy different orbitals. Generally speaking, electrons with greater energy move in orbitals farther away from the nucleus. When an atom gains or loses energy, the change is expressed by the movement of electrons. When something passes energy on to an atom, an electron may be temporarily boosted to a higher orbital (farther away from the nucleus). The electron only holds this position for a tiny fraction of a second; almost immediately, it is drawn back toward the nucleus, to its original orbital. As it returns to its original orbital, the electron releases the extra energy in the form of a photon, in some cases a light photon. "


And that's why i said due to transition.
 
Now you know differently, don't you?

Here's how you can stump the writer of that website. Since incandescent light bulbs are typically made of tungsten wire, then IF that description is correct, when one looks at the spectrum of the light made from that bulb, one will see discrete lines, and not only that, one should also see discrete lines corresponding to the tungsten element atomic energy levels!

If you have access to a simple spectroscope (i.e. diffraction grating an a telescope set), look at the difference in spectrum between light from an incandescent bulb, and say, a discharge tube of neon. You don't have to believe what I have said. Just look at those two spectrum. Even without knowing how light from each of those sources are "made", you can immediately tell that they are very different. One has a continuous band, the other has very distinct, discrete lines.

And if I go on to tell you that the neon discharge tube is certainly due to some atomic transition, you will then ask "So why is the light from the light bulb different?", which is exactly what you should ask howstuffworks.com.

Zz.
 
ZapperZ said:
Now you know differently, don't you?

One has a continuous band, the other has very distinct, discrete lines.

And if I go on to tell you that the neon discharge tube is certainly due to some atomic transition, you will then ask "So why is the light from the light bulb different?", which is exactly what you should ask howstuffworks.com.

Zz.

Zapper - That was very precisely put and has answered my query regarding the electron transition spectrum and the obvious flaw in the reasoning on that site.

Still, can you please tell - What is it that produces light due to vibration of the molecules. I can guess its related to inter conversion of energy...but should not it lead to heating effect instead of producing light. Again heat and light, you can say are inter linked but...What is light?
 
madhushala said:
Zapper - That was very precisely put and has answered my query regarding the electron transition spectrum and the obvious flaw in the reasoning on that site.

Still, can you please tell - What is it that produces light due to vibration of the molecules. I can guess its related to inter conversion of energy...but should not it lead to heating effect instead of producing light. Again heat and light, you can say are inter linked but...What is light?

The heating is the source to cause the vibration in the solid (a tungsten is a solid). A solid like that is made of a lattice of positive ions connected via electronic bonds. One can naively picture a lattice of + and -. When the solid is heated, the lattice vibrates. Heat it more, it vibrates with larger amplitude. When charges vibrate, they produce EM radiation.

So why is this a broad band spectrum rather than discrete? The vibration spectrum for the solid is broad and not discrete. That's why. So a series of vibrations with various continuous frequencies are possible. This relates to the continuous band spectrum of light that one gets.

Zz.
 
ZapperZ said:
So why is this a broad band spectrum rather than discrete? The vibration spectrum for the solid is broad and not discrete. That's why. So a series of vibrations with various continuous frequencies are possible. This relates to the continuous band spectrum of light that one gets.

Zz.
The broad spectrum from an incadescent lamp bulb is a smooth spectrum called the Planck thermal spectrum. Most of the energy is actually in the infrared. The spectrum from a fluorescent tube (and CFL) without phosphor has mercury spectral lines, primarily 436 and 546 nm.
 
Back
Top