Fundamentals of Electric Circuits - Sadiku Question on KVL

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the application of Kirchhoff's Voltage Law (KVL) in the context of a specific circuit problem from Sadiku's textbook. The equation presented, -12 + 4i + 2v0 - 4 + 6i = 0, raises questions regarding the sign of the voltage across the resistor V0. The consensus is that V0 is defined as -6i due to the direction of current flow, which is opposite to the assumed direction in the KVL loop. This clarification emphasizes the importance of consistent sign conventions in circuit analysis.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Kirchhoff's Voltage Law (KVL)
  • Familiarity with circuit analysis techniques
  • Knowledge of voltage and current definitions in electrical circuits
  • Basic concepts of resistive components and their behavior
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of Kirchhoff's Voltage Law in various circuit configurations
  • Explore the concept of sign conventions in circuit analysis
  • Review Sadiku's "Fundamentals of Electric Circuits" for additional practice problems
  • Learn about the impact of current direction on voltage calculations in resistive circuits
USEFUL FOR

Students of electrical engineering, circuit designers, and anyone seeking to deepen their understanding of circuit analysis and KVL applications.

Paola Flores
Messages
14
Reaction score
12
Member advised to use the formatting template for all homework help requests
practice_problem_2_6.jpg


Hi, this is my first time posting, I'm glad there is a space like this where we can share our doubts and hopefully get some help from other students.

As you can see on the image above, there's a KVL applied to the circuit in practice problem 2.6, but my question is the following:
On equation 2.6.1:

-12+4i+2v0-4+6i=0

for resistance V0, isn't that supposed to be -6i due to direction of the current?, a resistance can only dissipate which would make obvious the + but even on 2.6.2 it states V0=-6i, I don't want to ask my teacher because I feel the answer is probably something obvious that I am probably missing. Can anyone please elaborate on why this is being added instead of substracted to the KVL?

Thank you so much!
 

Attachments

  • practice_problem_2_6.jpg
    practice_problem_2_6.jpg
    25.5 KB · Views: 990
Physics news on Phys.org
The entire 2.6.1 has the opposite sign of what I would have used, but it is consistent. Note that the current i goes to the left in the lower line.

Paola Flores said:
but even on 2.6.2 it states V0=-6i
This has to do with the definition of ##v_0## with the higher potential being to the left and the current being defined as going to the left. This equation tells you directly that the current is going in the opposite direction of what was used in the KVL loop.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Paola Flores

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K