Galilean Invariance and constraints on Forces.

In summary: The constraints are that the force between the particles is a vector, and that the resultant force is a scalar. Newton's third law can be derived under these conditions.
  • #1
andresB
626
374
Let's say we have a system of two point particles that can interact with each other by forces that are position and velocity dependent. The forces might or might not be derivable from a generalized potential.
Assuming Isotropy of space and homogeneity of space and time, what are the constraints imposed on the possible forces between the particles? In particular, can Newton's third law be "derived" under such conditions?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
andresB said:
Assuming Isotropy of space and homogeneity of space and time, what are the constraints imposed on the possible forces between the particles? In particular, can Newton's third law be "derived" under such conditions?
Newton’s third law generalizes to the conservation of momentum and per Noether’s theorem the conservation of momentum is a consequence of the homogeneity of space.
 
  • #3
Indeed.

But, for example, in the case of electromagnetic interaction there is no Newton third law and you need to consider the momentum of the field to have conservation of momentum.

In the most general case of position and velocity dependent forces, what can be said about the forces if we assume homogenity and isotropy of space?
 
  • #4
andresB said:
But, for example, in the case of electromagnetic interaction there is no Newton third law and you need to consider the momentum of the field to have conservation of momentum.
Hence the word “generalizes” in my response above.

andresB said:
In the most general case of position and velocity dependent forces, what can be said about the forces if we assume homogenity and isotropy of space?
They will conserve linear momentum and angular momentum. Per Noether’s theorem.
 
  • #5
andresB said:
Let's say we have a system of two point particles that can interact with each other by forces that are position and velocity dependent. The forces might or might not be derivable from a generalized potential.
Assuming Isotropy of space and homogeneity of space and time, what are the constraints imposed on the possible forces between the particles?
##\boldsymbol F=\boldsymbol F(\boldsymbol r_1-\boldsymbol r_2)##
 
  • Like
Likes Ibix and Dale

1. What is Galilean Invariance?

Galilean Invariance is a principle in physics that states that the laws of motion are the same for all observers in uniform motion. This means that the laws of physics are independent of the frame of reference from which they are observed.

2. How does Galilean Invariance relate to forces?

Galilean Invariance places constraints on the forces that can act on a system. It states that the forces must be the same for all observers in uniform motion, regardless of their frame of reference. This ensures that the laws of physics, specifically Newton's laws of motion, hold true for all observers.

3. What are the implications of Galilean Invariance for classical mechanics?

Galilean Invariance is a fundamental principle in classical mechanics and is essential for the consistency of the laws of motion. It allows for the prediction and understanding of the behavior of objects in motion, and is the basis for many important theories, such as the theory of relativity.

4. Are there any exceptions to Galilean Invariance?

Galilean Invariance holds true in classical mechanics, but it is not applicable in situations involving high speeds or strong gravitational fields. In these cases, the laws of physics are described by different theories, such as Einstein's theory of relativity.

5. How does Galilean Invariance impact our understanding of the universe?

Galilean Invariance is a fundamental principle that helps us understand and predict the behavior of objects in motion. It allows us to make accurate measurements and observations, and has played a crucial role in the development of modern physics. Without it, our understanding of the universe would be incomplete.

Similar threads

  • Classical Physics
Replies
1
Views
610
  • Classical Physics
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
956
  • Special and General Relativity
5
Replies
146
Views
6K
  • Classical Physics
Replies
17
Views
22K
Replies
5
Views
731
  • Classical Physics
Replies
17
Views
1K
  • Mechanics
Replies
1
Views
968
Replies
19
Views
9K
Replies
38
Views
3K
Back
Top