Galileo, inclined plane and geometry.

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around Galileo's experiments with inclined planes and the relationship between the distance traveled by a ball and the time elapsed, expressed as s(t)=kt^2. Participants are exploring how the value of k relates to the slope of the inclined plane and the forces acting on the ball.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are attempting to derive the relationship between k and the angle of the incline, questioning the role of gravitational components and the implications of different slopes. Some are using trigonometric relationships and others are referencing Newton's laws, while others express confusion about the implications of their findings.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with various interpretations being explored. Some participants have suggested that k is independent of weight and related to the slope, while others are trying to prove their assertions without relying on Newton's laws. There is a mix of agreement and disagreement regarding the relationships being proposed.

Contextual Notes

Participants are constrained by the requirement to avoid using Newton's laws in their reasoning. There is also a focus on the implications of Galileo's choice of units for distance and the conditions under which k is defined.

talisman2212
Messages
20
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Galileo in seeking to discover the laws governing the motion of bodies under the action of their weight, conducted a series of experiments on inclined planes. Choosing as unit of length the distance traveled by the ball the first unit of time, measuring at subsequent time points the distance traveled and repeating the experimental procedure with different mass ball finds the same numerical result: the distance s traveled by any ball in the inclined plane under the influence of the weight, is square proportional to the time elapsed: s(t)=kt^2.
Gradually increasing the slope of the plane, finds that the value of k increases to a maximum value which takes at the vertical gradient, i.e. freefall. Can you determine the relation between k and the slope of the inclined plane?

Homework Equations



s(t)=kt^2

The Attempt at a Solution



I tried this one: let the inclined plane have angle \theta, then sin \theta= \frac{AB}{AO}, we use now the fact that the distance traveled by the ball is s(t)=kt^2 so we can find the distances AO and AB, that is sin \theta= \frac{AB}{AO} = \frac{gt^2}{kt^2} = \frac{g}{k}, but while \theta increases, k decreases, where is the wrong?

I tried also this: the first unit of time the ball travels distance: s(1)=k,
the second unit of time distance: s(2)=4k
and the third unit of time distance: s(3)=9k.
I tried to use the Thales' theorem (Intercept theorem), but I don't know how to move on.
 

Attachments

Physics news on Phys.org
k should be related to the component of the weight along the incline.
 
Basic_Physics said:
k should be related to the component of the weight along the incline.

That's wrong. k is related to the slope of the inclined plane and is independent from the weight. If we use Newton's law we have mk=mgsin \theta \Rightarrow k=gsin \theta I must prove this (without using Newton's law).
 
talisman2212 said:
That's wrong. k is related to the slope of the inclined plane and is independent from the weight.
Basic_Physics means that it's related to the fraction of the weight that acts along the slope. You have k sin(θ) = g, which makes k > g. Clearly that's wrong. What should the equation say?
 
The equation should say k=sin(θ)g, I am writing above what i have tried. Can someone help me to prove it?
 
For Galileo's choice of units of distance k will always be one:
" Choosing as unit of length the distance traveled by the ball the first unit of time..."
A graph of s vs t2 will be directly proportional with gradient k, but the graph goes through the point 1,1. This means its gradient will be k=1.
 
sin(θ) ≤ 1.0 so you are fine. With a little bit of reasoning one can came to the right conclusion then. When the plane is flat k should be 0 (no acceleration). When the plane is vertical k should be equal to g.
 
This ball is rolling not slipping
 
I must determine the relation between k and the slope of the inclined plane. I am writing at the top of the topic what I have tried, I found g=ksin(θ) this is wrong. I am trying to use the trigonometry of the problem (no sees that??). Can someome really help me to find the relation between k and the slope of the inclined plane? (without using Newton's law, but only the problem's data)
 
  • #10
One meaning that can be given to k is that it is the distance traveled along the incline when t = 1. Galileo did these "diluted acceleration" experiments to determine the relation beween distance covered and time for uniform accelerated motion. The component of gravity along the incline is
g\;sin(\theta)
This means that the speed obtained after 1 time unit will be
v_{1}=g\;sin(\theta)
The average speed is then
v_{avg}=\frac{g\;sin(\theta)}{2}
if it starts out of rest. The distance covered along the incline for 1 time unit will then be such that
\frac{g\;sin(\theta)}{2}\;t=k\;t^{2}
so that
\frac{g\;sin(\theta)}{2}\;=\;k
 
  • #11
talisman2212 said:
I tried this one: let the inclined plane have angle \theta, then sin \theta= \frac{AB}{AO}, we use now the fact that the distance traveled by the ball is s(t)=kt^2 so we can find the distances AO and AB, that is sin \theta= \frac{AB}{AO} = \frac{gt^2}{kt^2} = \frac{g}{k}, but while \theta increases, k decreases, where is the wrong?

If the vertical acceleration is 'a' then:

sin \theta= \frac{AB}{AO} = \frac{0.5at^2}{kt^2} = \frac{a}{2k}

When the plane is vertical (ie freefall), sin \theta = 1 and k = \frac{a}{2}.

From Newton's Law, at freefall, s(t) = \frac{1}{2}gt^2. From Galileo, s(t) = kt^2 = \frac{1}{2}at^2 so that the vertical acceleration a = g.

Is this the answer being sought? The mistake was using gt^2 as the vertical distance AB since the vertical acceleration is only equal to g in freefall.
 
  • #12
You haven't understand the problem at all, anyway I found the solution.
 

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
6K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
6K
Replies
11
Views
1K
Replies
46
Views
7K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K