There are equivilant definitions of Galois extensions listed here http://mathworld.wolfram.com/GaloisExtensionField.html but I'm confused about the equivilence of 1 and 2.(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

What am I doing wrong here? Take [tex]K[/tex] to be the splitting field of [tex]X^4-2[/tex] over [tex]\mathbb{Q}[/tex]. This is exactly property 1. But if you consider the automorphism of complex conjugation then it fixes the intermediate field [tex]\mathbb{Q} \subset (K\cap \mathbb{R})\subset K [/tex] which contradicts property 2. (yes I am abusing notation slightly. just consider some embedding of [tex]K[/tex] in [tex]\mathbb{C}[/tex] and my intersection makes sense)

I assume I've made a mistake since it's been a while since I've checked these sorts basic properties but where?

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Dismiss Notice

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Galois Extension field properties

Loading...

Similar Threads for Galois Extension field | Date |
---|---|

A Galois theorem in general algebraic extensions | Apr 29, 2017 |

(Relatively) Trivial question about extension field degrees (pertains to Galois theor | May 7, 2012 |

Galois Groups of Extensions by Roots of Unity | Apr 24, 2012 |

Galois Closure of p-Extensions | May 7, 2010 |

Galois extension of a field with Characteristic 0 | Aug 6, 2007 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**