Galous Group Modules Self Study: Q&A

  • Thread starter Thread starter tohauz
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Group Modules
tohauz
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
I was doing some self study and have questions:
1. p(x)=x^{7}+11 over Q(a), R.
where a is 7-th root of unity. What are Galouis groups?
For the 1st case I got Z_{7}, second not sure. need hint for that
2. need hint. I know it is easy: M is an R-module. Show that Hom_{R}(R,M)\congM.
3. Spse that I is an ideal of R such that I^{k}=0 for some k>0 integer. Let M, N be R-modules and let \phi:M->N be an R-module hom. Prove that if induced map \bar{\phi}:M/IM->N/IN is surjective, then \phi is surjective.
4. show that 2\otimes1 \neq0 in 2Z\otimesZ/2Z.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
2. You need a map from

{f : R-->M } to M

(or vice versa).Assuming that R is unital, then there is only one possible map you can write down:

f ---> f(1)

You have to try to show that is an isomorphism. You also may want to think about the other direction;

M --> {f: R --> M}

again, there is only one possible map you can write down - given m in M, then the only candidate in Hom_R(R,M) is translation by m:

f_m(r)= r.m

so you have to show that the map m--->f_m is an isomorphism (note we've dropped the explicit use use R being unital).
 
matt grime said:
2. You need a map from

{f : R-->M } to M

(or vice versa).


Assuming that R is unital, then there is only one possible map you can write down:

f ---> f(1)
This is what I tried. g(f)=f_{1}. But I had hard time showing that it is surjective
 
Have you tried working to find an inverse? The second part of my hint wasn't just decoration.
 
matt grime said:
Have you tried working to find an inverse? The second part of my hint wasn't just decoration.

yeah, i got it. thanks
 
#3 is somewhat tricky. The key is to prove that \varphi(IM) = IN. This can be done by induction on k, but first you'll need a lemma to the effect that if \bar{\varphi} is surjective, then the induced map \psi_r : I^r M/I^{r+1} \to I^r N/I^{r+1} is surjective for all r.

Let me think about the others some more...I'll get back to you in a bit. (Although #4 looks pretty trivial.)
 
Last edited:
I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...

Similar threads

Back
Top