Game Theory -Deletion of strictly dominated strategies

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the deletion of strictly dominated strategies in game theory, specifically addressing a homework problem. The participant identifies that Player 1's strategy 'c' can be eliminated as it is strictly dominated by strategies 'a' and 'b'. However, they struggle to find a strictly dominated strategy for Player 2. The conversation suggests that Player 2 should play strategy 'a', which dominates their other options, leading to a pure-strategy Nash equilibrium of (a,a). The final part of the discussion encourages exploring mixed strategies to determine Player 2's best response and further analyze the equilibrium.
jb7
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Hi, I was wondering if I could get some help with these questions.

fazz4l.jpg



Homework Equations



n/a

The Attempt at a Solution



a) I (think) I can do this one, mutual best responses would suggest that the nash equilbria are (a,a), (a,b) and (b,c)

b) Now this is the question where I get stuck. Player 1's strategy c can be eliminated, as it is strictly dominated by a (and b). But I am not sure what to do from here, I am guessing that I have to eliminate a strategy for player 2, but I can't see any that are strictly dominated. There don't even seem to be any strategies that are eliminated by mixed strategies..

please help! thanks :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
no ideas?
 
Usually you ignore dominated strategies when finding a pure-strategy equilibrium. So player 2 plays a) which dominates his other strategies. And player 1 plays a), so the pure-strategy equilibrium is (a,a).

In b), the only eliminated strategy is p1_c, like you said. So that's it.

For c), suppose that P1 played both a and b with non-zero weight. What would P2's best response be? Suppose both sides played the resultant strategies. ie, P1 played a/b in some proportion, and P2 played his best response. Would this be a Nash equilibrium?

Now use the answers from b) and c) to find part d).
 
I picked up this problem from the Schaum's series book titled "College Mathematics" by Ayres/Schmidt. It is a solved problem in the book. But what surprised me was that the solution to this problem was given in one line without any explanation. I could, therefore, not understand how the given one-line solution was reached. The one-line solution in the book says: The equation is ##x \cos{\omega} +y \sin{\omega} - 5 = 0##, ##\omega## being the parameter. From my side, the only thing I could...
Back
Top