Gauche Effect & SN2 Reactions: Sigma-Sigma* Orbital Interactions

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the gauche effect and SN2 reactions, specifically examining the role of ##\sigma-\sigma^*## orbital interactions in these phenomena. Participants explore the implications of these interactions in the context of molecular orbital theory and their effects on bonding and reactivity.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant describes the gauche effect in 1,2-diflouroethane, suggesting that the C-F bonding orbital becomes antibonding, allowing for overlap with the C-H ##\sigma## orbital.
  • Another participant challenges this view, stating that electron density from a nearby filled orbital is brought into the antibonding orbital (C-X), rather than the bonding orbital being emptied.
  • A different participant questions how a C-Nu bond can form when the C-Cl antibonding molecular orbital (ABMO) is filled, raising concerns about the simultaneous formation of bonding and antibonding molecular orbitals.
  • One participant expresses skepticism about using organic chemistry textbooks to learn molecular orbital theory, implying that they may not adequately address these concepts.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the nature of orbital interactions in the context of the gauche effect and SN2 reactions. The discussion remains unresolved, with multiple competing perspectives on the role of bonding and antibonding orbitals.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations in the discussion regarding the assumptions made about molecular orbital configurations and the treatment of bonding versus antibonding interactions, which remain unresolved.

Titan97
Gold Member
Messages
450
Reaction score
18
Recently, I read two chapters from March's advanced organic chemistry. I came across gauche effect and SN2 reactions. In both phenomena, ##\sigma-\sigma^*## orbital interactions is involved. In gauche effect present in 1,2-diflouroethane, the C-F bonding orbital becomes an antibonding orbital so that C-H ##\sigma## orbital can overlap with the empty C-F ##\sigma## orbital.
Capture2.PNG


In SN2 mechanism, C-X bonding becomes antibonding orbital so that the nucleophile can attack the empty ##\sigma## orbital of Carbon
Capture.PNG


Am I correct? Is there any flaw in my understanding?
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
No, it is just that electron density from a near by orbital (e.g. the filled orbital on Nu) is brought into the anti-bonding orbital (C-X). This compensates the bonding by the filled C-X sigma orbital. It is not so that the latter one is emptied somehow.
 
C-X bond has a bonding and an antibonding orbital. Initially 2 electrons are filled in BO. That is, if the reactant was CH3Cl, then a +sp3 orbital of C and a p-orbital of Cl would overlap. This forms BMO. But how can C-Nu bond form when C-Cl ABMO is filled?

Also, how can BMO and ABMO be formed simultaneously? Its given everywhere that 2 orbitals overlap to give two molecular orbitals. But each MO requires a different configuration of orbital.
 
Last edited:
O-chem books are not a good place to learn about MO-theory.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
Replies
6
Views
21K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K