Gauge fields - how many physical degrees of freedom?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the counting of physical degrees of freedom (dof) in gauge theories, particularly focusing on non-abelian gauge theories such as those involving gluons in quantum chromodynamics (QCD). Participants explore the implications of gauge symmetries and the nature of massless spin-1 particles in this context.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant states that the photon field has two physical dof, which are its transverse polarization directions, and questions how to count dof for non-abelian gauge theories, specifically for massless spin-1 particles transforming under SU(N).
  • Another participant asserts that there are 2 dof per gluon color.
  • Some participants clarify that there are N^2-1 gauge bosons in the SU(N) group, correcting an earlier claim about the number of gluons in QCD's SU(3) representation.
  • A participant discusses the need to impose gauge conditions on gluons to reduce the dof to just the physical ones, comparing it to the electromagnetic case.
  • One participant mentions that the gauge group has 8 parameters, which they suggest is the correct number needed for the counting process.
  • Another participant provides a detailed mathematical framework for counting physical dof using the temporal gauge and Gauß law constraint, leading to a formula for physical dof based on the dimensionality of space-time and the number of colors.
  • There is an acknowledgment of the complexity involved in the gauge symmetry and its implications for unphysical dof beyond just longitudinal and time-like states.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the basic premise that gluons have 2 dof each, but there is disagreement regarding the implications of gauge symmetry and the total counting of physical dof in non-abelian gauge theories. The discussion remains unresolved on some aspects of the counting process and the implications of gauge conditions.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes various assumptions about gauge theories and the counting of dof, which may depend on specific definitions and the mathematical framework used. There are unresolved mathematical steps related to the implications of gauge conditions and the nature of unphysical dof.

Lapidus
Messages
344
Reaction score
12
The photon field has two physical degrees of freedom (dof): its two transverse polarization directions.

But what about non-abelian gauge theories? What about N massless spin-1 particles that transfom under SU(N), how do I count their degrees of freedom?

Gluons, for example, are massless spin-1 particles, so I assume that each of them has only two physical dof and the unphysical dof (the longitudal and time-like) can be 'gauged away'. But there are three color gluons that transform in the adjoint rep of SU(N), so that might be too naive, since all three gluons get mixed into each other. But how many physical dof do gluons have?

thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
2 dof per each gluon color.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Yes, 2 dof per gluon. What do you mean by
But there are three color gluons that transform in the adjoint rep of SU(N)
That's not right. there are N^2-1 gauge bosons in the SU(N) group. That's eight (not three) gluons for QCD's SU(3) adjoint representation
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
dauto said:
Yes, 2 dof per gluon. What do you mean by
That's not right. there are N^2-1 gauge bosons in the SU(N) group. That's eight (not three) gluons for QCD's SU(3) adjoint representation

Of course! I messed that up.

Now let's suppose we want analog to the E-M case impose gauge conditions on the gluons to reduce the dof down to just the physical dof. I know the E-M four-vec potential has four components, i.e. the two physical transverse states and the unphysical longitudinal and time-like state. Do I have to impose 8x2 gauge conditions on the SU(3) gauge symmetry to cut down the 8x2 physical dof of the SU(3) gauge theory?

Every gluon is a massless spin-1 particle, so each has two dof. OK. But is not the gauge symmetry bigger than for the photons and does not that imply more unphysical dof? Dof other than the longitudinal and time-like states?


thanks again!
 
The gauge group has 8 parameters which is exactly the right number needed.
 
The most transparent way to eliminate unphysical d.o.f. and to count physical d.o.f. is the temporal gauge plus Gauß law constraint. You start with D-dimensional space-time

##\mu =0,1,\ldots,D-1##

and N colors i.e. SU(N)

##a=1,2,\ldots,N^2-1##

Then for

##A_\mu^a##

we have

##Z_\text{tot} = D \cdot (N^2-1)##

d.o.f. in total.

Due to the anti-symmetry of the field strength tensor we have

##F_{00}^a = 0##

That means that A0 is no dynamical d.o.f. but acts as a Lagrange multipler generating the Gauß law constraint. We chose the temporal gauge

##A_0^a = 0##

and keep the Gauß law as a condition for physical states, i.e.

##G^a |\text{phys}\rangle = 0##

This reduces the d.o.f. to the physical subspace. Each condition (gauge condition, Gauß constraint) removes

##N^2-1##

unphysical d.o.f. We get

##Z_\text{phys} = Z^\prime = Z_\text{tot} - Z_\text{unphys} = D \cdot (N^2-1) - 2 \cdot (N^2-1) = (D-2) \cdot (N^2-1)##

So we find
D = 1+1: Z' = 0
D = 2+1: Z' = N2-1
D = 3+1: Z' = 2 * (N2-1)

That means that (up to topological d.o.f.) in 1-dim space gauge fields can be eliminated by imposing Gauß law. In 3-dim. space each gluon color (there are 9-1=8) carries 2 polarizations which results in 16 physical d.o.f.

You can use the same reasoning for U(1) replacing N2-1 by 1.
For U(N) ~ SU(N) * U(1) like in the electro-weak theory you have to replace N2-1 by N2; that means that the additional d.o.f. is just the photon.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
A big thank you, Tom! This was extremely helpful.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
10K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K