Gauss Law and potential Which one to use

AI Thread Summary
In discussions about calculating the electric field from a symmetric charge distribution, Gauss's Law is often favored for its simplicity and effectiveness. However, the choice between using Gauss's Law or electric potential depends on the specific scenario, such as the distance from the charge or the need for a general solution. For general electrostatics, solving Poisson's equation can be advantageous, especially in various coordinate systems. The use of orthogonal function expansions can also provide effective solutions based on symmetry. Ultimately, the method selected should align with the problem's requirements and the desired accuracy.
Elumalai
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Given a symmetric Charge distribution where Gauss Law can be applied which method will one select to obtain Electric field. Potential or Gauss Law. I feel that Gauss law must be used because using Gauss law one can calculate electric field easily as compared to Potential. Which is advantageous, Gauss Law or potential.

Thanks in Advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Honestly I say it varies considerably. If you are looking far away your treatment will be different, then if you want a general solution. But for general electrostatics, solving possion's equation is a joy, and the laplacian is separable in something like 13 different coordinate systems. Using an orthogonal function expansion is a nice way depending on the symmetry then.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top