Gaussian vs. non-Gaussian fluctuations

AI Thread Summary
In the context of inflation, Gaussian fluctuations refer to a random distribution of cosmic microwave background (CMB) photons, while non-Gaussian fluctuations indicate a preferred distribution linked to topological defects in the universe. Non-Gaussianity raises concerns among cosmologists as it can violate the cosmological principle. Various mechanisms can generate non-Gaussianity during inflation, including multiple fields, non-slow roll evolution, and non-canonical kinetic terms. Additionally, non-Gaussianity can manifest in the amplitude distribution of fluctuations in the temperature power spectrum without breaching isotropy. Understanding these fluctuations is crucial for insights into the inflationary process and the early universe.
Einj
Messages
464
Reaction score
59
Hello everyone,
I know this is a very basic question but I was wondering, in the context of inflation, what does it mean to have gaussian or non-gaussian fluctuations.
First of all, are we talking about the fluctuations of the inflation?
Second of all, how is the nature of the fluctuations related to the mechanism of inflation, say e.g. the inflaton potential?

Thanks!
 
Space news on Phys.org
Gaussian, wrt to the CMB, refers to a distribution of CMB photons that is consistent with a gaussian probability curve [i.e., random]. A non-guassian distribution suggests a preferred distribution of CMB photons [i.e., corresponding to topological defects in the universe]. Most cosmologists are suspicious of non gaussianity because it violates the cosmological principle.
 
  • Like
Likes Einj
Thanks for the reply! How can non-gaussianity be generated at the level of inflation?
 
Einj said:
Thanks for the reply! How can non-gaussianity be generated at the level of inflation?
All sorts of ways: multiple fields, non-slow roll evolution, strong higher-order couplings, non-trivial vacuum/initial state, non-canonical kinetic terms (e.g. DBI inflation), etc...
 
Chronos said:
Gaussian, wrt to the CMB, refers to a distribution of CMB photons that is consistent with a gaussian probability curve [i.e., random]. A non-guassian distribution suggests a preferred distribution of CMB photons [i.e., corresponding to topological defects in the universe]. Most cosmologists are suspicious of non gaussianity because it violates the cosmological principle.
Nongaussianity can also arise in the distribution of the amplitude of fluctuations (the a_{\ell m}) in the temperature power spectrum. I believe this can happen without violating isotropy.
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recombination_(cosmology) Was a matter density right after the decoupling low enough to consider the vacuum as the actual vacuum, and not the medium through which the light propagates with the speed lower than ##({\epsilon_0\mu_0})^{-1/2}##? I'm asking this in context of the calculation of the observable universe radius, where the time integral of the inverse of the scale factor is multiplied by the constant speed of light ##c##.
Why was the Hubble constant assumed to be decreasing and slowing down (decelerating) the expansion rate of the Universe, while at the same time Dark Energy is presumably accelerating the expansion? And to thicken the plot. recent news from NASA indicates that the Hubble constant is now increasing. Can you clarify this enigma? Also., if the Hubble constant eventually decreases, why is there a lower limit to its value?
Back
Top