Gaussian Wave Packet: Reflection & Transmission

AI Thread Summary
When a Gaussian wave packet travels from a denser medium to a less dense one, it results in both an upright reflected wave packet and an upright transmitted wave packet. Conversely, if the wave packet moves from a less dense medium to a denser one, the reflected wave packet is inverted. This behavior is analogous to elastic collisions in particle physics, where the mass density affects the wave's reflection and transmission. A similar phenomenon occurs in optics, where light reflects differently depending on whether it transitions from a medium of lower to higher refractive index or vice versa. Understanding these principles helps clarify wave behavior across different mediums.
h0dgey84bc
Messages
159
Reaction score
0
If you imagine a string, the first part of the string (that the gaussian looking wave peak is moving along) has thicker mass density than the latter part of the string. (so it's essentially a thick bit of string going on to a thinner bit).
What would happen when the wavepacket reaches the latter section? I think you will get an upright reflected wavepacket and also an upright transmitted wavepacket, is this correct?
(the reason I think this is because I'm thinking it's like the wavefunction of a free particle, colliding with a stationary particle of lower mass, so it's analogous to an elastic collision?)

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
h0dgey84bc said:
I think you will get an upright reflected wavepacket and also an upright transmitted wavepacket, is this correct?

Yes. If the packet goes enters from the other direction, and goes from the "light" string to the "heavy" string, the reflected packet is inverted. I've done this as a demonstration in intro physics classes.

You have something similar in optics. Light reflecting off a air-to-glass boundary (from outside the glass) is phase shifted by half a cycle, but not when reflecting off a glass-to-air boundary (from inside the glass). Here what matters is whether the index of refraction increases or decreases as you go across the boundary.
 
thanks, I like the optics comparison, shall help me remember the order.
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field propagation'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Maxwell’s equations imply the following wave equation for the electric field $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}}{\partial t^2} = \frac{1}{\varepsilon_0}\nabla\rho+\mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf J}{\partial t}.\tag{1}$$ I wonder if eqn.##(1)## can be split into the following transverse part $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}_T-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}_T}{\partial t^2} = \mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf{J}_T}{\partial t}\tag{2}$$ and longitudinal part...
Thread 'Recovering Hamilton's Equations from Poisson brackets'
The issue : Let me start by copying and pasting the relevant passage from the text, thanks to modern day methods of computing. The trouble is, in equation (4.79), it completely ignores the partial derivative of ##q_i## with respect to time, i.e. it puts ##\partial q_i/\partial t=0##. But ##q_i## is a dynamical variable of ##t##, or ##q_i(t)##. In the derivation of Hamilton's equations from the Hamiltonian, viz. ##H = p_i \dot q_i-L##, nowhere did we assume that ##\partial q_i/\partial...
Back
Top