Gauss's law and nonuniform electric field

Click For Summary
A Gaussian surface shaped as a cube with an edge length of 1.40m is analyzed under a nonuniform electric field E=[-4i+(6+3y)j]N/C. The solution manual indicates that the constant part of the electric field, E0=-4i+6j, does not contribute to the flux because its effects cancel out across opposite faces of the cube. When calculating flux for individual faces, the constant vector does produce a nonzero flux on one side, but an equal and opposite flux on the opposite side results in a net flux of zero. This understanding stems from the principle that the total flux through a closed surface must account for contributions from all sides. The discussion emphasizes the importance of considering both constant and variable components of electric fields in flux calculations.
boredbluejay
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A Gaussian surface is in the shape of a cube with edge length 1.40m. The electric field is E=[-4i+(6+3y)j]N/C.

I got an answer, but the solution manual stated that we treat the electric field as E=3yj+E0, where E0=-4i+6j, which does not contribute to the flux. Why is this? Please help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The flux of a constant vector is zero as the contribution from one side of the cube is positive and negative from the opposite side.

ehild
 
Ah, okay. I didn't know that. But when calculating the flux of individual faces, does the constant vector contribute?
 
You know how to get a flux of a vector field B(r) at an surface area A? you integrate the normal component of the vector B : Φ=∫BndA.
The normal component refers to the outward normal. Although there is nonzero flux from the constant vector on on side, there is the same with opposite sign on the opposite side.

ehild
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
698
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
12
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K