Gauss's Law Problem: General than Coulomb's Law?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Kolahal Bhattacharya
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gauss's law Law
AI Thread Summary
Gauss's law is more general than Coulomb's law, as it can be applied to both static and moving charges, regardless of their velocities or accelerations. While Coulomb's law is limited to stationary charges, the Lienard-Wiechert potentials are necessary for analyzing moving charges. Gauss's law remains valid since the divergence of the electric field (div E) equals 4π times the charge density (rho) in all scenarios. However, due to the loss of symmetry with moving charges, Gauss's law can only provide the integral of the electric field over a closed surface rather than the electric field at a specific point. The relationship between electric and magnetic fields, as described by Maxwell's equations, further illustrates why Gauss's law holds while Coulomb's law does not apply to moving charges.
Kolahal Bhattacharya
Messages
133
Reaction score
1
I read in Corson and Lorrain that Gauss's law is more gneral than Coulomb's law.It can even be applied to moving charges whatever be their velocities/accelerations.Can anyone explain this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Coulomb's law cannot be applied to moving charges.
The Lienard-Wiechert potentials have to be used.
Since div E=4pi rho in all cases, Gauss's law still applies.
However since the symmetry is lost, Gauss's law just gives the integral of E over a closed surface and can't be used to find E(r).
 
Well,I found it in a text I mentioned.I think we may think this way:the charge inside the closed surface will be static or moving.Whatever the case,the fluxes are electric as well as magnetic.Gauss's law still holds because, magnetic flux out of a closed surface is zero.We do not find the B field when charges inside are in motion.
 
This is clear if we look at the Maxwell Equations. The curl of E is no longer zero, for the particle is moving and that makes the B changing with time. Thus the Coloumb's Law fails but div E is unchanging and Gauss's Law holds.
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top