Maxwell's Equations: Validity of Gauss' Theorem

  • Thread starter Thread starter Goldbeetle
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the validity of Maxwell's equation regarding the divergence of the electric field and its relationship to charge density. It is clarified that this equation is valid not only in static fields but also in dynamic situations involving varying electric and magnetic fields. Participants confirm that both the differential and integral forms of the equation are equivalent and hold true in general conditions. The consensus is that the equation remains valid regardless of field variations. Overall, the equation's validity in both static and dynamic contexts is affirmed.
Goldbeetle
Messages
210
Reaction score
1
Dear all,
I have a doubt on the validity of one of the Maxwell's equations, the one that states that the divergence of the electrical field is proportional to the charge density. As far as I can remember it should be not only valid in the static field case but in the general. I do not see a variating electrical-magnetical field would violate this law.

Thanks,
Godlbeetle
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Is there a question in there? It looks like a statement: "I don't believe Maxwell's Equations are correct."
 
Yes, thanks, there is a question. Is that equation valid only in the static case?
 
No, it's always valid.
 
The same if the equation is in its integral form?
 
Goldbeetle said:
The same if the equation is in its integral form?

The vector operator and integral forms are equivalent, so yes.
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field propagation'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Maxwell’s equations imply the following wave equation for the electric field $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}}{\partial t^2} = \frac{1}{\varepsilon_0}\nabla\rho+\mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf J}{\partial t}.\tag{1}$$ I wonder if eqn.##(1)## can be split into the following transverse part $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}_T-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}_T}{\partial t^2} = \mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf{J}_T}{\partial t}\tag{2}$$ and longitudinal part...
Thread 'Recovering Hamilton's Equations from Poisson brackets'
The issue : Let me start by copying and pasting the relevant passage from the text, thanks to modern day methods of computing. The trouble is, in equation (4.79), it completely ignores the partial derivative of ##q_i## with respect to time, i.e. it puts ##\partial q_i/\partial t=0##. But ##q_i## is a dynamical variable of ##t##, or ##q_i(t)##. In the derivation of Hamilton's equations from the Hamiltonian, viz. ##H = p_i \dot q_i-L##, nowhere did we assume that ##\partial q_i/\partial...
Back
Top