Java Finding the Greatest Common Divisor in Java: A Beginner's Guide

  • Thread starter Thread starter JaysFan31
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gcd Method
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around creating a Java method to find the greatest common divisor (GCD) of two positive integers without using the Euclidean Algorithm. A beginner programmer shares their initial attempts, expressing confusion over their code structure and logic. They receive feedback highlighting several issues, such as the misuse of loop conditions, variable scope, and the need for clearer logic. Suggestions include simplifying the code by avoiding redundancy and using a more conventional loop structure. An improved version of the GCD function is proposed, which efficiently handles various cases by counting down from the smaller of the two integers. Additionally, a recursive approach using the Euclidean Algorithm is mentioned as a more concise alternative, although the original poster is restricted from using it. The conversation emphasizes the importance of clarity in coding practices and logical flow in programming.
JaysFan31
I am a beginner programmer in Java. Just started learning the past few weeks.

I'm taking a class and need to create a method that finds the greatest common divisor of two integers. I can assume that both are positive, but I cannot use the Euclidean Algorithm.

I'm sort of lost, but I think I'm on the right track, although this may look confusing:
Code:
public static int gcd(int a, int c)
{
int gcd;
int attempt;
if (a > c)
{
 if (a % c == 0)
{
gcd = c;
return gcd;
}
else
{
for (attempt = c; attempt = 1; attempt--)
do
{
if (c % attempt == 0 && a % attempt == 0)
{
gcd = attempt;
return attempt;
}
}
while (c % attempt != 0 || a % attempt == 0);
}
}
And then I basically copied the code with an else statement if c > a.

I'm sure there are a lot of mistakes. Could someone just point them out and offer a simpler way of doing it (possibly without using the Euclidean Algorithm)?

Thanks.
Michael
 
Technology news on Phys.org
If you have a for loop, I don't think you want to use a variable with a larger scope as the counter variable. And you also don't need to copy the code for the case c > a. You can say "if a % c == 0 || c % a = 0 {return min(a,c);}" and make the for loop only run up to min(a,c). This isn't too creative though, as you can guess. But other than your straightforward approach above and the Euclidean Algorithm, I can't think of any other ways to find the gcd.
 
Last edited:
The way you used a local variable "int gcd" inside the function with the same name "public static int gcd(...)" is confusing (though not actually wrong).

In Java you can just say

return c;

instead of

gcd = c;
return gcd;

I wonder if you found some Fortran code and tried to translate it into Java. In Fortran you would write something like

function gcd(...)
integer gcd
...
gcd = c
return

But that (slightly strange) syntax is specific to Fortran, Java and C are different.

The efficient way to find the GCD is Euclid's algorithm (look it up on Google). You can either write the code using a loop, or use a recursive function. (If you haven't gone recursion yet, come back to this later.)
 
Last edited:
OK. I think this is a lot better. It compiles and makes sense to me at least. However, it doesn't work properly for more difficult integers like 20, 30. Can anyone spot the problem (as I said nothing wrong with compiling, just doesn't work logically). As I said before, I can't use the Euclidean Algorithm, so I basically had to write the simplest program to find gcd.

Code:
public static int gcd(int a, int b)
{
int gcd;
if (a > b && a % b == 0)
{
gcd = b;
return gcd;
}
else if (b > a && b % a == 0)
{
gcd = a;
return gcd;
}
else if (a > b && a % b != 0)
{
int count = b;
do
{
count = count - 1;
}
while (b % count != 0 && a % count != 0);
gcd = count;
return gcd;
}
else if (b > a && b % a != 0)
{
int count = a;
do
{
count = count - 1;
}
while (b % count != 0 && a % count != 0);
gcd = count;
return gcd;
}
else
{
gcd = a;
return gcd;
}
}
 
You have got confused between "&&" to "||" which is a common mistake. Often in English you say "and" when you really mean "or", and vice versa.

Actually, the "do {...} while(...)" statement with a complicated "while(...)" condition is often hard to understand, and it is quite a rare statement in most Java programs.

A loop which tests at the top, "while(...) { ... }" is much more common. If you use that form of loop, then "&&" is the correct operator and the statement means the same read "in English" and "in Java".

There is another advantage of testing at the start of the loop - it gives you the possibility of doing nothing, if the condition is true before you get to the loop. That is often useful.

It's certainly useful calculating the gcd, because it handles all your special cases like a = b, a > b and a & b = 0, etc.

I came up with this version, which handles all the cases the same way:

public static int gcd(int a, int b)
{
int count = a;
if (b < a)
{
count = b;
}

while (a % count != 0 && b % count != 0)
{
count = count - 1;
}
return count;
}

A recursive function using Euclid's algorithm is even shorter:

public static int gcd(int a, int b)
{
if (a % b == 0)
return b;
else
return gcd(b, a % b);
}
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Is this public key encryption?'
I've tried to intuit public key encryption but never quite managed. But this seems to wrap it up in a bow. This seems to be a very elegant way of transmitting a message publicly that only the sender and receiver can decipher. Is this how PKE works? No, it cant be. In the above case, the requester knows the target's "secret" key - because they have his ID, and therefore knows his birthdate.
I tried a web search "the loss of programming ", and found an article saying that all aspects of writing, developing, and testing software programs will one day all be handled through artificial intelligence. One must wonder then, who is responsible. WHO is responsible for any problems, bugs, deficiencies, or whatever malfunctions which the programs make their users endure? Things may work wrong however the "wrong" happens. AI needs to fix the problems for the users. Any way to...

Similar threads

Replies
13
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
4K
Back
Top