General definition of capacitance

AI Thread Summary
Capacitance is defined as the ratio of charge (Q) on one conductor to the potential difference (V) between two conductors, expressed as C = Q/V. In cases where the charges on the conductors differ, such as +Q and -Q/2, the capacitance can still be determined by considering the effective charges that face each other, which will redistribute to create equal but opposite charges. The measurement of capacitance typically involves analyzing the reactance in AC circuits or the time-constant in R-C circuits, rather than directly using the Q/V formula. The concept of capacitance is primarily applicable to pairs of conductors with equal and opposite charges, and the definition remains unchanged regardless of the charge distribution. Understanding capacitance requires a grasp of electric fields and potential differences, especially in complex arrangements of conductors.
StatusX
Homework Helper
Messages
2,570
Reaction score
2
the general definition of capacitance is that if you have an arrangement of two conductors, and you put a charge +Q on one and -Q on the other, and a potential difference of V results between them, the capacitance is Q/V. But what if the charges on each conductor don't have the same magnitude, say +Q and -Q/2? Is there any way to measure the capacitance from this setup? Or, given the capacitance for the normal case, could you derive the potential difference that will result here?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's the potential DIFFERENCE, and the DIFFERENCE in the number of charged particles that matters. Suppose one plate is +5Q and the other is +3Q. The difference of 2Q is what is important. Also, C = Q/V may be a definition of capacitance, but it's not used in measuring it (not directly, at least). Capacitance is measured either by determining its reactance to a particular frequency AC voltage, or the time-constant of an R-C circuit it's part of.
 
Say you have two conducting plates. You put a charge of +Q and -Q/2 respectively on them. Then you place them facing each other as the plates of a parralel plate conductor.

Now, the charges on the plates will be redistributed in such a way that the sides of the two plates facing each other will have equal but opposite charges. The capacitance is calculated taking only these charges into account.

You can verify this if you apply the theorems that electric field inside a conductor is zero in static conditions and take the superposition of electric fields due to charges on all four faces of the two plates.( after assuming suitable variables for them )


spacetime
www.geocities.com/physics_all/
 
Thanks for your replies, but I'm still not sure.

pack rat: If that's the case, then there should always be a potential difference of 0 between any two conductors with the same charge, regardless of shape or position. I don't see how this could be, since if you brought one in from infinity, it would seem they would repel for most of the trip, and thus you must be establishing a potential difference.

spacetime: I don't think that's necessarily true (what if you have two plates with equal charge: on which one will the charges move?), and anyway, that only works for parellel plates. I'm talking about the general case.
 
You want to first ask yourself what you mean by "capacitance of a pair of conductors with different charges". Capacitance is actually defined only for a single conductor. It has become common to extend this definition (to the capacitance of a pair of conductors with equal and opposite charges on them) to the popular version of "charge per unit voltage".

For a general system of conductors, one has :

Q_i = \sum _j {C_{ij}V_j
where C_ii is the capacitance of the i'th conductor.

This comes from solving the Poisson Equation with the Green's Function for the system of conductors, and inverting it (since that would give you V_i = \sum {C'_{ij}\rho _j})

So really, the capacitance of a conductor is the charge on it when it is maintained at 1 volt, and all the other conductors are grounded.
 
The definition of capacitance is as you already said -- it does not change just because you charge two plates differently and then bring them into proximity
which would change the potential difference between them.
The definition is fixed ..
Ray.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top