General method of parameterization

  • Thread starter Thread starter DivergentSpectrum
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    General Method
AI Thread Summary
There is no universal formula or algorithm to parameterize every equation in the form f(x,y)=0 or g(x,y,z)=0 using elementary functions. While some functions can be parameterized, such as x^2+y^2=1 with trigonometric functions, many others do not allow for such transformations. The ability to parameterize depends on the specific properties of the function in question. For numerical solutions, algorithms can be implemented to generate ordered sets of points, but these will be limited by memory constraints and may only yield approximations. Software tools like MATLAB or Mathematica can assist in creating contour plots to visualize these functions.
DivergentSpectrum
Messages
149
Reaction score
15
is there a general formula/algorithm to parameterize an equation?

for example if i have a function
f(x,y)=0
then can i always change it to the form x(t),y(t)?

or if i had g(x,y,z)=0

then can i change it to something like x(u,v),y(u,v),z(u,v)

i know of examples, like if i have x^2+y^2=1 then i know its cos(t),sin(t) but there's a lot of other functions out there.

I guess what I am asking, is if there is always a parameterization in terms of elementary functions, and if not, what kinds of numeric algorithms are available?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
This depends on the properties of the function. The general answer is no.
 
so is there an algorithm i could use in computer programming that takes f(x,y)=0 for example and returns an ordered set of points?
 
This is again going to depend on your function. Perhaps the only functions you will encounter are nice enough. A computer code will never give you the full set of points simply because of memory limitations. You might want a finite set of points that give you a reasonable approximation? The contour plotting function of softwares like MATLAB or mathematica should be able to do that for you.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top