General rule for a confusing series

Jesseac
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I am a year 12 IB maths HL student... and i was wondering about the possibility of a general rule for a particular problem... I was looking at the following rules, which came up in a basic textbook exercise on mathematical induction.

1+2+3+4+...+n=(n^2+n)/2 where n is a positive integer
(1^2)+(2^2)+...+(n^2)=(n(n+1)(2n+1))/6, where n is a positive integer

I was wondering if there exists a rule for the case.

(1^a)+(2^a)+(3^a)+(4^a)+...+(n^a), where both n and a are positive integers.

This problem has been bugging me for quite some time. I had the feeling that the problem may be slightly different for odd values of a as opposed to even values of a.

Also, if there does indeed exist a general rule or rules for this case, I was wondering if someone could give an outline as to the method used to prove this (as I'm not so confident in attempting it for myself).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
yes it exists in terms of the Hurwitz zeta function or Bernoulli Polynomials

if 'm' is an integer

1+2^{m}+...+k^{m} = \frac{B_{m+1}(k)-B_{m+1}(0)}{m+1}

otherwise you need the Hurwitz zeta function.. look at this at wikipedia.
 
Jesseac said:
if someone could give an outline as to the method used to prove this (as I'm not so confident in attempting it for myself).

I don't know a general rule for discovering formulas for sums, but proving they work is often straightforward. If you think that \sum_{i=0}^n a_i = G(n)
then see if you can write G(n) as F(n+1) - F(0) for some F(n) with the property that \triangle F(n) = F(n+1) - F(n) = a_n.

If you can do that, you're done, since for such a F(n),

\sum_{i=0}^n a_n = \sum_{i=0}^n (F(n+1)-F(n))

=(F[1] - F[0]) + (F[2] - F[1] ) + (F(3) - F(2)) + ... (F(n+1) - F(n) )

which "telescopes" to F(n+1) - F(0)

Example: a_n = n
G(n) = \frac{(n)(n+1)}{2}
F(n) = \frac{(n-1)(n)}{2}

\triangle F(n) = \frac{(n)(n+1)}{2} - \frac{(n-1)(n)}{2}
= \frac{n^2 + n}{2} - \frac{n^2 - n }{2} = n = a_n
You can also invent summation formulas for complicated looking sequences by setting F(n) equal to some formula and working backwards to the series that it sums.
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...
Back
Top