Generalised energy and energy (lagrangian mechanics)

AI Thread Summary
In Lagrangian mechanics, kinetic energy being quadratic implies that energy equals generalized energy. However, this condition also suggests that none of the position vectors depend explicitly on time. It is possible for a Lagrangian to be time-independent, leading to conserved generalized energy, even when kinetic energy is not quadratic, which means energy does not equal generalized energy. The formulas for generalized energy and energy are provided, highlighting their relationship. Understanding these distinctions is crucial for mastering Lagrangian mechanics.
supaman5
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
I'm doing lagrangian mechanics and trying to understand my notes, are these three statements correct:

1. If kinetic energy is quadratic then energy equals generalised energy.
2. Saying kinetic energy of a system is quadratic is the same as saying none of the position vectors in a system depend explicitly on time.
3. A lagrangian can be independent of time (generalised energy is conserved) even if kinetic energy is not quadratic (energy DOESN'T equal generalised energy)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hopefully putting the formulas for generalised energy and energy might help:

L=T-V (kin-pot)

generalised energy: h= \sum\frac{\partial L}{\partial \dot{q}}\dot{q}-L where \dot{q} should be bold and is the time derivative vector for all generalised coordinates.

and energy: E=T+V

Took me about an hour to write out that formula...FAIL.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top