I Generalized Eigenvalues of Pauli Matrices

thatboi
Messages
130
Reaction score
20
Consider a generic Hermitian 2x2 matrix ##H = aI+b\sigma_{x}+c\sigma_{y}+d\sigma_{z}## where ##a,b,c,d## are real numbers, ##I## is the identity matrix and ##\sigma_{i}## are the 2x2 Pauli Matrices. We know that the eigenvalues for ##H## is ##d\pm\sqrt{a^2+b^2+c^2}## but now suppose I have the matrix ##\tilde{H} = (\sigma_{x} \otimes A) + (\sigma_{y} \otimes B) + (\sigma_{z} \otimes C)## , where ##\otimes## denotes the Kronecker product and ##A,B,C## are now N x N diagonal matrices with diagonal entries ##a_{i},b_{i},c_{i}## respectively. I'm wondering if there is some nice generalization of the 2x2 eigenvalue formula in my first statement? I feel like there must be.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I did some half-baked thinking and scratch work and think it is tractable. Seems like the answer is ##c_i \pm \sqrt{a_i^2+b_i^2}##. The matrix can be written as something that looks like:

##\tilde{H}=diag(a_1\sigma_x+b_1\sigma_y+c_1\sigma_z, \ldots,a_N\sigma_x+b_N\sigma_y+c_N\sigma_z)##

So it is just a bunch of copies of the simple case.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top