Generating Power from a Small Hydro Plant on a 10m High Waterfall

  • Thread starter Thread starter TN17
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Power
AI Thread Summary
A small hydro plant is being developed near a 10m high waterfall with a river flow of 1.5m/s, 4m wide, and 1m deep. The calculations show that the volume of water passing over the waterfall is 6m³/s, translating to a mass of 6000 kg. The total energy at the top of the waterfall is calculated to be 594,750 J/s, combining both potential and kinetic energy. Assuming a 25% efficiency in energy conversion, the power generated would be approximately 148,687.5 W. The discussion also touches on concerns about the assumption of a conservative system due to friction in flowing water.
TN17
Messages
45
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A small hydro plant is being built. A nearby river is 4m wide and 1m deep. The water flow is 1.5m/s over the brink of a 10m high waterfall. The turbine company advertises 25% efficiency in converting the potential energy of the water into electric energy. What's the power you can generate?

Homework Equations


Ug = mgh
K= 0.5mv2

The Attempt at a Solution


Since V = 1.5 m/s, I found the volume of water passing over the brink of the waterfall, every second:

Volume/ sec = LWH = 1.5(4)(1) = 6m3/ sec

Convert to mass:1m3 = 1000 kg
6m3 = 6000 kg

Since I did the beginning calculations for "every second", I wrote the rest of the values as "per second" too

At the top of the waterfall, there is grav.potential and kinetic energy:
Ug = mgh = 6000(9.8)(10) = 588 000 J / s
AND
K = 0.5mv2 = 0.5(6000)(1.5)2 = 6750 J/s
SO
Etop = 6750 + 588 000 = 594 750 J/s


I'm not sure if it is right to assume that this system is conservative because there's a lot of friction in flowing water, but I did anyway...

At the bottom of the waterfall, there is kinetic energy. Assuming a conservative system:
Ebottom = Etop
Ebottom = 594 750 J/s

% efficiency is 25%, so:
25% of 594 750 = 148687.5 J/s = 148687.5 W = POWER
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Looks right, though you might get some points off for having too many significant figures in your answer.
 
This is off topic, but how do I delete a post?
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top