Fixing "Datasource Creation Error" in Genie 2000 w/ Virtualbox

  • Thread starter Thread starter Robert Dorr
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The user successfully ran a Genie 2000 system on native Windows XP Pro but encountered issues when transitioning to a virtual Windows XP Pro machine using VirtualBox. The MidWiz software recognized the Lynx MCA device, but the "Gamma Acquisition & Analysis" application produced a "Datasource Creation Error" when trying to open new devices. Additionally, changes made in the application were not saved, unlike in the native system. The problem was traced to VirtualBox's handling of parallel port emulation, which affected the authorization dongle. Switching to VMWare resolved the issues, allowing the system to function correctly.
Robert Dorr
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I've been running a Genie 2000 system under native Windows XP Pro just fine. I want to run it in a virtual Windows XP Pro machine using Virtualbox. I've installed it in the virtual machine and when I use the MidWiz to create a new device it discovers my Lynx MCA properly. When I try to open the new device using "Open Datasource" in the "Gamma Acquisition & Analysis" application, I get the error "Datasource Creation Error". It never finds any device I have created using MidWiz. I've noticed also that it doesn't seem to keep any changes I've made to the "Gamma Acquisition & Analysis" window, although in my native XP system that works properly, it does. What file is attempting to be accessed when the "Open Datasource" command is executed in the "Gamma Acquisition" application? Any suggestions and information would be appreciated.

Thanks
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
I'll reply to my own question. I solved my problem in a roundabout manner. I decided to give VMWare a try and low and behold it worked. It appears to be in the way they handle their parallel port emulation. The Genie 2K uses a parallel port authorization dongle and apparently it doesn't like the way that Virtualbox takes care of the parallel port. Anyway, it's all working fine now.

Thanks
 
Hello, I'm currently trying to compare theoretical results with an MCNP simulation. I'm using two discrete sets of data, intensity (probability) and linear attenuation coefficient, both functions of energy, to produce an attenuated energy spectrum after x-rays have passed through a thin layer of lead. I've been running through the calculations and I'm getting a higher average attenuated energy (~74 keV) than initial average energy (~33 keV). My guess is I'm doing something wrong somewhere...
Back
Top