Genome paper conclusively proves Bigfoots are real

  • Thread starter Thread starter surajt88
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Paper
AI Thread Summary
A recent genome paper claims to provide conclusive evidence for the existence of Bigfoot, asserting that Sasquatch is an extant hominin and a direct maternal descendant of modern humans. The paper's unusual nature is highlighted by its comparison to content from the television series "Monster Quest" and its publication in a self-owned journal, raising questions about its credibility. Critics emphasize that the lack of a reputable peer-review process undermines the validity of the findings, suggesting that the paper does not meet scientific standards for evidence.
surajt88
Messages
63
Reaction score
0
Genome paper "conclusively proves" Bigfoots are real

http://arstechnica.com/science/2013/02/bigfoot-genome-paper-conclusively-proves-that-sasquatch-is-real/

It's not often you come across a scientific paper which notes that the information it covers is like something "seen on the television series Monster Quest." And you rarely read a paper which concludes, "The data conclusively proves that the Sasquatch exist as an extant hominin and are a direct maternal descendant of modern humans." But today, we have such a paper—and there's nothing usual about it, including the journal where it appears.
 
Biology news on Phys.org


When you own the journal you can publish what you like.
 


This is not a credible source, the author had to create their own journal just to get it "published"
 
Chagas disease, long considered only a threat abroad, is established in California and the Southern U.S. According to articles in the Los Angeles Times, "Chagas disease, long considered only a threat abroad, is established in California and the Southern U.S.", and "Kissing bugs bring deadly disease to California". LA Times requires a subscription. Related article -...
I am reading Nicholas Wade's book A Troublesome Inheritance. Please let's not make this thread a critique about the merits or demerits of the book. This thread is my attempt to understanding the evidence that Natural Selection in the human genome was recent and regional. On Page 103 of A Troublesome Inheritance, Wade writes the following: "The regional nature of selection was first made evident in a genomewide scan undertaken by Jonathan Pritchard, a population geneticist at the...

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
16K
Replies
6
Views
6K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
27K
Replies
9
Views
3K
Back
Top