Geodesic quation coordinate time

Svendsen
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hi guys

So I am having trouble reparameterizing the geodesic equation in terms of coordinate time.
Normally you have:

\frac{d^2 x^{\alpha}}{d \tau^2} + \Gamma_{nm}^{\alpha} \frac{d x^{n}}{d \tau}\frac{d x^{m}}{d \tau} = 0

Where \tau is the proper time. I class we were told to express the above in terms of coordinate time and so i reasoned that one would use the chain rule:

\frac{d }{d \tau} = \frac{d t}{d \tau} \frac{d }{d t}

When i do so i get the following:

\frac{d^2 x^{\alpha}}{d t^2} + \Gamma_{nm}^{\alpha} \frac{d x^{n}}{d t}\frac{d x^{m}}{d t} = - \frac{d^2t/d \tau^2}{dt/d\tau} \frac{d x^{\alpha}}{dt}

Which - i guess - has the form that one would expect because t is non-affine.

However i don't know how to proceed from here. I´ve tried to use d\tau ^2 = g_{nm}dx^ndx^m to find dt/d \tau, but i can´t seem to get anything meaningful.

Thanks for your time!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I did something related to this once upon a time, but it's been a while. Are you looking to find the form of the geodesic equations given that you have ##x^1##, ##x^2##, ##x^3## as functions of t? If so I might try to reconstruct what I did if you haven't already figured it out by the time I get to it., As I recall it was a matter of using the chain rule, plus some algebra involving the geodesic equation for ##x^0## (which is another name for "t") in it's original form as a function of ##\tau##, i.e. the standard geodesic equation for ##x^0(\tau)## or ##t(\tau)##.
 
You cannot simplify it any further but you can express it in terms of meaningful quantities: ##\frac{dt}{d\tau} = u^0 = \gamma## where ##\gamma## is the "time dilation factor" of the particle in the coordinate system that it is moving through. In stationary space-times, that is those with a time-like Killing field, you can also express ##\frac{dt}{d\tau}## in terms of the conserved energy per unit mass ##e##. For example in Schwarzschild space-time we have ##e = (1 - \frac{2M}{r})\frac{dt}{d\tau}##. Furthermore you can use the geodesic equation for ##\alpha = t## to get rid of ##\frac{d^2 t}{d\tau^2}##.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes Svendsen
What did you mean by meaningful? This is the expression for geodesic parametrized by non-affine parameter and any actual physical manifestation might require information on the physical system. If you mean to eliminate the τ derivatives; then I think it is possible to set α to 0th component.

In case you have never done so, physical interpretations usually rely on the Newtonian weak field limit, where the τ derivatives are eliminated by the original geodesic equation under that limit (again by setting α to 0 and making suitable assumptions about the Christoffel connection coefficients).
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
According to the General Theory of Relativity, time does not pass on a black hole, which means that processes they don't work either. As the object becomes heavier, the speed of matter falling on it for an observer on Earth will first increase, and then slow down, due to the effect of time dilation. And then it will stop altogether. As a result, we will not get a black hole, since the critical mass will not be reached. Although the object will continue to attract matter, it will not be a...
Back
Top