Intersection of Hyperboloid & 2-Plane=Ellipse

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on finding the intersection of a hyperboloid, specifically ##AdS_3## defined by the equation ##X_0^2-X_1^2-X_2^2+X_3^2=L^2##, with a 2-plane described by ##X_0+X_2=Le^{w/L}##. The user initially struggles to recognize the resulting equation from the intersection as an ellipse. However, they later confirm that they have solved the problem and request others to share their solutions and figures for clarity and future reference.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of hyperbolic geometry and hyperboloids
  • Familiarity with 2-plane equations in three-dimensional space
  • Knowledge of mathematical notation and equations involving exponential functions
  • Ability to interpret and manipulate algebraic expressions
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the properties of hyperboloids in three-dimensional geometry
  • Study the derivation of intersections between surfaces and planes
  • Learn about the geometric representation of ellipses in three-dimensional space
  • Investigate the applications of AdS space in theoretical physics
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and students studying geometry, particularly those interested in hyperbolic spaces and their intersections with planes.

adsquestion
Messages
34
Reaction score
0
I want to try and see the intersection between the hyperboloid and the 2-plane giving an ellipse. So far I have the following:

I'm going to work with ##AdS_3## for simplicity which is the hyperboloid given by the surface (see eqn 10 in above notes for reason) ##X_0^2-X_1^2-X_2^2+X_3^2=L^2##

If I take the eqn of the 2-plane to be (see Figure 11) ##X_0+X_2=Le^{w/L}## then ##X_0^2+X_2^2=L^2e^{2w/L}-2X_0X_2##

Substituting for the intersection gives ##(X_0+X_2)^2-X_1^2-2X_2^2+X_3^2=L^2 \quad \Rightarrow L^2 e^{2w/L} -2X_0X_2-X_1^2-2X_2^2+X_3^2=L^2## which I don't recognise as anything to do with an ellipse?

EDIT: solved :)
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Please show us what you did.
Also post the figures you reference.

This is common courtesy towards people that find this through google or forum search.
 
In an inertial frame of reference (IFR), there are two fixed points, A and B, which share an entangled state $$ \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(|0>_A|1>_B+|1>_A|0>_B) $$ At point A, a measurement is made. The state then collapses to $$ |a>_A|b>_B, \{a,b\}=\{0,1\} $$ We assume that A has the state ##|a>_A## and B has ##|b>_B## simultaneously, i.e., when their synchronized clocks both read time T However, in other inertial frames, due to the relativity of simultaneity, the moment when B has ##|b>_B##...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 75 ·
3
Replies
75
Views
7K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 61 ·
3
Replies
61
Views
13K
  • · Replies 61 ·
3
Replies
61
Views
11K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 125 ·
5
Replies
125
Views
20K