Geometric and Physical Interpretation of Diagonalization

hliu8
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I am a second year student in quantum mechanics. I heard in lecture that simultaneous diagonalization of matrices is important in quantum mechanics. I would like to know why is it significant when two matrices can be simultaneous diagonalized, and what is the geometric and physical interpretation of simultaneous diagonalization of matrices in quantum mechanics and in physics in general.

Thank you for everyone's help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The physical interpretation of this result is that if you can simultaneously diagonalise two matrices then the corresponding operators (if the matrices in question are Hermitian) are compatiable. This means that they commute since it is possible to find a commom eigenvector basis for both of the matrices. Ultimately, this means that one can simultaneously measure both of those observables on the quantum system of interest. Thus, in this case there should be no uncertainty relation between the operators and one can be expressed as a function of the other.
 
  • Like
Likes Matiasss
To put it a little more physically, (hermitian) matrices represent observable physical quantities. If you have a state which, when acted upon by a matrix, returns itself multiplied by a constant, that state has a definite value of the observable associated with the matrix. A compete set of such states will diagonalize the matrix.

If a common set of states can diagonalize two matrices simultaneously, it means that those states have definite values of both observables. So, the statement that there is no uncertainty relation between the observables is quite correct. However, it is not the case that one can be expressed as a function of the other. In general, the observables are independent (like the energy and angular momentum of the electron in a hydrogen atom).
 
  • Like
Likes Matiasss
I would like to know why is it significant when two matrices can be simultaneous diagonalized, and what is the geometric and physical interpretation of simultaneous diagonalization of matrices in quantum mechanics and in physics in general.
It's often useful, when studying a matrix, to look at the eigenvectors. Even better if you can choose a basis whose vectors are all eigenvectors.

So, if two matrices can be simultaneously diagonalized...
 
while diagonalizing an operator A with a matrix S (formed from eigenvectors of A), does S need to be unitary (i.e., whether I have to form it with the NORMALIZED eigenvectors)? Even if S is not unitary, A gets diagonalized.
 
This post is a spin-off of the original post that discussed Barandes theory, A new realistic stochastic interpretation of Quantum Mechanics, for any details about the interpretation in general PLEASE look up for an answer there. Now I want this post to focus on this pre-print: J. A. Barandes, "New Prospects for a Causally Local Formulation of Quantum Theory", arXiv 2402.16935 (2024) My main concerns are that Barandes thinks this deflates the anti-classical Bell's theorem. In Barandes...
I understand that the world of interpretations of quantum mechanics is very complex, as experimental data hasn't completely falsified the main deterministic interpretations (such as Everett), vs non-deterministc ones, however, I read in online sources that Objective Collapse theories are being increasingly challenged. Does this mean that deterministic interpretations are more likely to be true? I always understood that the "collapse" or "measurement problem" was how we phrased the fact that...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In her YouTube video Bell’s Theorem Experiments on Entangled Photons, Dr. Fugate shows how polarization-entangled photons violate Bell’s inequality. In this Insight, I will use quantum information theory to explain why such entangled photon-polarization qubits violate the version of Bell’s inequality due to John Clauser, Michael Horne, Abner Shimony, and Richard Holt known as the...
Back
Top