Let f and g be real differentiable functions.(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

Let v be a vectorial function of a real variable t, such that:

v(t) = ( f(t), g(t) )

I know that by definition v'(t) = ( f'(t), g'(t) )

In many books they give a geomtrical interpretation of this. They draw the curve (the values of f(t) in the x axis, the values of g(t) in y axis). They take two points in the curve (say v(t0) and v(t0 + h) ) and they draw the positions vectors of both.

They say: if you take smaller "h" then the vector v(t0 + h) - v(t0) gets nearer and nearer the tangent line that touches the curve in v(t0).

So they assume that if you take smallers "h" then the point v(t0 + h) will be nearer to v(t0) in the curve. Which is the basis of this assumption?

Thanks.

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Geometrical interpretation of vector derivative

Loading...

Similar Threads for Geometrical interpretation vector | Date |
---|---|

I Geometrical interpretation of gradient | May 26, 2017 |

Geometric interpretations of double/triple integrals | Jul 21, 2015 |

Help with interpreting a derivative of a given function geometrically. | Jun 27, 2014 |

Geometric interpretation of partial derivatives | Mar 14, 2014 |

Geometric interpretation of \int x f'(x) | Apr 21, 2011 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**