Geometry (Proof right triangle angle sum is 180)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on proving that the angles in a right triangle sum to 180 degrees, a property that applies to all triangles in Euclidean geometry. A suggested proof involves constructing a line parallel to one side of the triangle, demonstrating that the angles formed with this line correspond to the triangle's angles through congruence and the concept of alternating interior angles. The conversation emphasizes that the sum of angles in any triangle, not just right triangles, is 180 degrees, referencing Euclid's Proposition 32 for foundational support. The technical term for angles that add up to 180 degrees is "supplementary." Overall, the proof relies on fundamental properties of parallel lines and angles in Euclidean geometry.
Lucky_69
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hi guys not sure were this goes sorry...

It's been a while sense I have taken geometry so my skills are a little rusty...

It tunrs out that I need to prove that the angles in a right tranlge add up to 180

I have looked on the internet and people just tell me oh this angle and that angle are complementary

However this does me no good as I no longer know how to prove that two angles are complementary I do remeber what it means just don't remeber how to prove it...

so if you could point me to a proof for right triangles that the sum of all of its angles is 180 that would be great

please tell me in statement reason format because just telling me two angles are complementary won't tell me anything becasue I don't remeber how to prove why two angles are complementary but I still remeber what it means...

Thanks guys!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Why prove that a right triangle's angles add to 180 degrees? That is true in any triangle (in Euclidean geometry) and depends upon properties of parallel lines (which is why I added "in Euclidean geometry"). At one vertex, construct a line parallel to the side of the triangle opposite that vertex. Now show that the three angles the triangle makes with that line are congruent to the three angles in the triangle (one of them is an angle in the triangle, the other two are "alternating interior angles").
 
Is this any help? The five steps on the right support the main proof (6) on the left. Pairs of lines with double dashes through them are parallel to each other. Pairs of lines with single dashes through them are also parallel to each other. Like Halls of Ivy says, the angles of any triangle (in Euclidean space) add up to 180 degrees, not just a right-angled triangle. I drew an acute triangle, but the same logic applies to right-angled or obtuse triangles. The technical term for a pair of angles which add up to 180 degrees is "supplementary".
 

Attachments

  • triangle.jpg
    triangle.jpg
    36.5 KB · Views: 555
  • Like
Likes physics user1
I think it is better to think of the angles of a triangle adding up to a straight angle, or half a circle. The the notion of degrees is a purely arbitrary add on, but this may not be clear to the student.

Euclid, Book 1, Proposition 32 says the sum of the three interior angles of a triangle add up to two right angles.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top