Geometry Question - Complex numbers & triangles

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on finding complex numbers for the vertices of triangle ABC based on the midpoints of its sides, represented by complex numbers z_1, z_2, and z_3. The initial confusion involves the choice of the origin, with a suggestion that placing it at vertex A leads to vertices B and C being represented as 2*z_3 and 2*z_2, respectively. However, it is clarified that the origin's location is irrelevant to the problem, as the focus is on similar triangles. The realization emphasizes that the relationship between the midpoints and vertices remains consistent regardless of the origin. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding the properties of complex numbers in geometric contexts.
MattL
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
OK, I've got this question to do:

Find complex numbers representing the vertices of a triangle ABC given
that the midpoints of the sides BC, CA, AB are represented by complex numbers
z_1, z_2, z_3 respectively.

Thing is, I don't know where I'm taking the origin to be; if I took it at A then I would just have A is O, B is 2*z_3, C is 2*z_2. Surely there's more to the question than that?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
yeah, oops, just realized it's about similar triangle and it doesn't matter where the origin is...
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top