Get Astronomy Homework Help for Confusing Problems - Due Tomorrow Morning!

  • Thread starter Thread starter ElizebethDylan
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Astronomy
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a user seeking urgent help with confusing astronomy homework questions due the next morning. Key issues include poorly phrased questions, particularly regarding concepts of damage versus data in space probes and the nature of planetary surfaces. Participants express frustration over the ambiguity of questions related to speed, geological activity, and magnetic fields. There is a consensus that many questions lack clarity and scientific rigor, making them difficult to answer. Overall, the thread highlights the challenges of understanding and interpreting complex astronomy concepts under tight deadlines.
ElizebethDylan
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Astronomy news on Phys.org
We normally have a rule about telling people the answer to homework - but these are the worst phrased 'science' questions I have seen for a while.

7, I would say C but it's not a science question. It depends on what the probe is supposed to do and the balance of damage vs data ?

8, If a is true b is also true. e is wrong it is the weakest. d isn't even a question so C ?

9, Do they mean linear speed or angular velocity ?

10, What does this even mean ??
a, they don't have life - neother do most planets
b, False the lack of craters is due to either the ice reforming over the surface (Europa) or the active surface being replaced by volcanoes (io)
c, so the anallogy is poor, does thtis mean the question is wrong.
d, planets are formed from different things as well
e, so what does this mean for the question?

11, Is the nearest so far to being science! If a small object like io is still active 4 billion years later it has to be a heat source that is constantly supplying new energy = tidal.

12, a might be true, don't know. It would have to be a very thin atmosphere given the low temperature. b and d are obviously wrong.
c - sort of makes sense except is it really plate techtonics if there is no subduction zones/ ridge spreading.
e - none of the above would seem to apply to almost all these questions.

13 d - you need moving conducting material to make a magnetic field. So you would have to have a molten metal core.

14 a - we sort of answered this in 10

15, Is a stamp collecting question = know the name of a named feature. As a hint a donut is a torus - but that doesn't mean whoever named the object on io named it a torus.

16, is just rig if you know the numbers.

17, They are all organic molecules, they are also all hydrocarbons or you could just say chemicals. This is not an english lit exam, do you pick the term that rhymes best!

18 is just match the word water from the previous sentance.

19 Just use F=ma

20, A question that asks you to just go and look it up on the web !
 
Last edited:
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...

Similar threads

Back
Top