Get the lead out, or birth of a musket ball

  • Thread starter Thread starter Loren Booda
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ball Lead
AI Thread Summary
Musket balls were historically made by dropping molten lead from a height into water, which raises concerns about their sphericity due to potential irregularities. Modern technology could enhance this process by improving timing and temperature controls, leading to more uniform shapes. In a weightless environment, surface tension could theoretically create perfectly spherical balls, although spin would still pose challenges. The discussion also highlights the historical significance of shot towers in the production of musket balls. Overall, advancements in technology could significantly refine the manufacturing process of musket balls.
Loren Booda
Messages
3,108
Reaction score
4
Musket balls were once produced by dropping a measured amount of molten lead from a high tower into a trough of water. What various abberations from musket ball sphericity would you anticipate, and with the technology present how might you improve on this process?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Shot towers

Check out http://www.nysata.com/historical_memorabilia/shot_towers.htm for information on the history of shot-making. As for irregularities, try and think about timing and temperature controls we have today.

Good luck.
-F
 
Last edited by a moderator:
In a weightless environment you could make a ball that was formed only with surface tension, no air resistance or gravity to distort it. Spin would still be a problem though.

Njorl
 
Cyclotron Boy,

Your link is a beautiful "shot to the past."
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top