I Get the time axis right in an inverse Fast Fourier Transform

Nora
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
TL;DR Summary
time (distance) axis of Inverse Fast Fourier Transform (IFFT) from Vector Network Analyzer (VNA) S-parameter data.
Hi
I would like to transform the S-parameter responce, collected from a Vector Network Analyzer (VNA), in time domain by using the Inverse Fast Fourier Transform (IFFT) . I use MATLAB IFFT function to do this and the response looks correct, the problem is that I do not manage to the time scaling correct. The VNA has a build in time domain toolbox so I know how it should look like, see the figure below.
Return-Loss, time domain, VNA.jpg

In the figure below I have plotted the MATLAB transformed data with the index on x-axis (also zoomed in between N=0 to 20, N_max is 1600)
Return-Loss, time domain, MATLAB.jpg

At first I assumed that the increment on x-axis would be 1/bw/N_max where bw is the band width (i.e. f_max-f_min) and N_max is the number of samples. This is obviously wrong with a factor of 1e-3.
I would much appreciate if someone would like to help to get this correct! I have attached the S-matrix data in the txt file. First column is the frequency in GHz, second is real part of the response and third is imaginary part of the response.
My thanks in advance
/Thomas
 

Attachments

  • Return-Loss, time domain, VNA.jpg
    Return-Loss, time domain, VNA.jpg
    29.5 KB · Views: 238
  • data.txt
    data.txt
    50 KB · Views: 274
Mathematics news on Phys.org
The time step is given by
$$
\Delta t = \frac{1}{N \Delta f}
$$
From the data file, it appears that ##\Delta f = 0.00125\ \mathrm{GHz}## (the frequencies appear to be rounded values).
 
Hi
Thanks for the answer! Yes, this makes sense.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top