Getting to this 4th order O.D.E.

  • Thread starter Thread starter hushish
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on confusion regarding the derivation of a fourth-order ordinary differential equation (O.D.E.) and the terms involved in the equations presented. Steve questions the presence of a t² term in the denominator of the k4 term after equation (3), suggesting it should only involve t¹. He notes discrepancies in the substitution used, particularly regarding the second moment of area and its impact on the final answer. Additionally, he seeks clarification on the final derivation of equation (4), expressing uncertainty about the expected form of the particular solution. The conversation highlights the complexities of deriving and understanding terms in higher-order O.D.E.s.
hushish
Messages
28
Reaction score
0
Hi,

Try as I might, I cannot understand how equation (3) with the k4 term was derived. In equation (2), w is a function of t. But in the k4 term after equation (3), there is a t2 term in the denominator. Should it not be a t1 only? What am I missing? Please help.

Regards,

Steve
 

Attachments

  • ODE query.PNG
    ODE query.PNG
    36.6 KB · Views: 507
Engineering news on Phys.org
The screenshot is not so clear. are these the equations?
##w = \sigma_x \frac{l}{R}=\frac{\sigma w t}{R} - \frac{Ety}{R^2} ##

and the substitution used is
##\frac{d^2y}{dx^2}=\frac{M}{D}##
##D=\frac{Et^2}{12(1-\mu^2)}##
##w=\frac{d^2M}{dx^2}=D\frac{d^4y}{dx^4}##

This leads indeed to a different answer with t instead of ##t^2##, but I do not know where the error is. It could be in the answer or in the substitution rule. You might need to check the second moment of area for your specific geometry to see if it is correct.
 
Hi,

I think the copy of the paper is unclear. I think there is a t3 term in D. Sorry for the confusion...

BUT, I could use your help with the final derivation of equation (4)-see attached. I know that the particular solution to the 4th order O.D.E should look something like this:
y(x) = k4(Rδ/E)x4/24
But, I don't see that in equation (4). What am I missing?

Regards,

Steve
 

Attachments

  • Deriving equation (4).PNG
    Deriving equation (4).PNG
    12.9 KB · Views: 578
Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
Thread 'How can I find the cleanout for my building drain?'
I am a long distance truck driver, but I recently completed a plumbing program with Stratford Career Institute. In the chapter of my textbook Repairing DWV Systems, the author says that if there is a clog in the building drain, one can clear out the clog by using a snake augur or maybe some other type of tool into the cleanout for the building drain. The author said that the cleanout for the building drain is usually near the stack. I live in a duplex townhouse. Just out of curiosity, I...
I have an engine that uses a dry sump oiling system. The oil collection pan has three AN fittings to use for scavenging. Two of the fittings are approximately on the same level, the third is about 1/2 to 3/4 inch higher than the other two. The system ran for years with no problem using a three stage pump (one pressure and two scavenge stages). The two scavenge stages were connected at times to any two of the three AN fittings on the tank. Recently I tried an upgrade to a four stage pump...

Similar threads

Back
Top