Giant Galactic Blobs: Uncovering Dark Matter?

  • Thread starter Garth
  • Start date
In summary, the Giant Galactic Blobs are not likely to be evidence of dark matter. Instead, they may be a remnant of galaxy formation, or a result of the gravitational pull of dark matter. The theory must be modified to account for the observation.
  • #36
If there is a shielding effect, one would expect that it would be pretty localized and not have a big effect on large scale dynamics. Why? Because most of the universe is empty space. Even in a typical galaxy, there isn't much line of sight/geodesic line interference.

Also, given the small OOM of the proposed allais effect, and the huge masses necessary to produce the effect (planetary), gravitational shielding seems like it would be pretty much a curiosity only.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
  • #37
Good points, ohwilleke, however if the Allais effect is experimentally verified, it will by no means be a curiosity. A very basic and important implication of the Allais effect (if proven) is that the mechanics of gravitation is inadequately described by GR. GR says that masses warp space-time. If the gravitational effect of the Sun, as measured at any place on the Earth can be moderated by placing our very modest-sized moon directly between the Sun and that location (solar eclipse), then we will have to admit that the GR mathematical model of space-time curvature is only a handy approximation, and is not "real" in and of itself. The shielding effect proposed by Allais begs for a true mechanical (kinetic/dynamical) model of gravitation, which is where LQG is currently stuck - trying to reconcile flat-field quantum physics with the curved space-time of GR.

I will shut up now, lest I be accused of hand-waving by those much wiser and more perceptive than myself.
 
  • #38
turbo-1 said:
A very basic and important implication of the Allais effect (if proven) is that the mechanics of gravitation is inadequately described by GR.

Good point. And, of course, new physics is always interesting, even when it isn't very useful.
 
  • #39
ohwilleke said:
Along this line, McGaugh (a MOND guy) has a paper describing constraints on the distribution of DM is you say MOND is wrong on DM is right.

Another paper in a similar vein is here: http://cul.arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0406487
 
  • #40
ohwilleke said:
If there is a shielding effect, one would expect that it would be pretty localized and not have a big effect on large scale dynamics. Why? Because most of the universe is empty space. Even in a typical galaxy, there isn't much line of sight/geodesic line interference.

Also, given the small OOM of the proposed allais effect, and the huge masses necessary to produce the effect (planetary), gravitational shielding seems like it would be pretty much a curiosity only.
I agree entirely. I can't picture how such an effect would have any large scale consequences. I was merely thinking it might be interesting to see what, if anything, would happen if you plugged the effect into an N-body simulation - assuming of course the effect is real and could be quantified.
 

Similar threads

  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Cosmology
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
20
Views
2K
Replies
66
Views
7K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
10
Views
3K
Back
Top