I Understanding the Derivation of the Ginzburg Criterion for the Ising Model

thatboi
Messages
130
Reaction score
20
For the Ising Model, the Ginzburg Criterion is, for ##m_{0}## the order parameter and ##\delta m## the fluctuations: $$\langle\delta m\left(x\right)\delta m\left(x^{\prime}\right)\rangle << m_{0}^{2}$$. I want to understand how to derive the left hand side of the inequality from ##\langle M^{2} \rangle - \langle M \rangle ^{2}## where ##M = m_{0} + \delta_{m}##. Just from plugging in, I'm not sure how most of the terms cancel out, or what the fate of a term like ##\langle \delta m\rangle \langle \delta m \rangle## is.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ok, I think the best way of understanding that ##\langle \delta m \rangle = 0## is by calculating the probability associated with ##\delta m## i.e. calculating its Boltzmann weight and noticing that it is a Gaussian random variable with 0 mean. The other more physical way of arguing it is that we know ##m_{0}## is the value of the order parameter that minimizes the Helmholtz Free Energy so we expect ##\langle M \rangle = m_{0}##.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In her YouTube video Bell’s Theorem Experiments on Entangled Photons, Dr. Fugate shows how polarization-entangled photons violate Bell’s inequality. In this Insight, I will use quantum information theory to explain why such entangled photon-polarization qubits violate the version of Bell’s inequality due to John Clauser, Michael Horne, Abner Shimony, and Richard Holt known as the...
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
I asked a question related to a table levitating but I am going to try to be specific about my question after one of the forum mentors stated I should make my question more specific (although I'm still not sure why one couldn't have asked if a table levitating is possible according to physics). Specifically, I am interested in knowing how much justification we have for an extreme low probability thermal fluctuation that results in a "miraculous" event compared to, say, a dice roll. Does a...
Back
Top