Girl Reaches 99.9% of Train's Speed Despite Time Slowing Down

  • Thread starter Thread starter Grimstone
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Confused Time
AI Thread Summary
A discussion on the implications of relativity highlights that a girl running inside a train traveling at 99.9% of the speed of light cannot reach the speed of light herself due to time dilation and length contraction effects. Although her speed is added to the train's speed, this addition is non-linear at relativistic speeds, preventing her from exceeding the speed of light. Observers inside the train perceive normal speeds, but from an external viewpoint, relativistic effects alter the perception of speed and distance. Comparisons are made to a Tomcat jet firing a missile, illustrating how velocities combine differently at lower speeds. Ultimately, the principles of relativity dictate that as speeds approach light, the addition of velocities becomes increasingly complex.
Grimstone
Messages
66
Reaction score
0
I was watching a vid with Mr Hawking talking about a train (fictional) that gets to 99.9 C.
and the little girl gets up and runs forward. "as time in the train has slowed down. her momentum is not added to that of the trains speed. So she never reaches C"

A. trains %99.9 of C
B. time inside the train slows down.
C. the girls speed IS added to the trains but because time slowed down Even more? she can't hit C?

Tomcat does mach2 fires a sidewinder that does mach2. for a short bit. that winder IS doing mach4.
so why is Suzie's speed not added to the trains and thus she is moving faster than the train.

PLEASE KEEP THE ANSWER SIMPLE. I'M STUPID.
 
Space news on Phys.org
It' because not only does the girl's clock run slower, but also, for an outside observer, all distances within the train are contracted. Such she can never reach c.
 
Markus Hanke said:
It' because not only does the girl's clock run slower, but also, for an outside observer, all distances within the train are contracted. Such she can never reach c.

but from a insiders view?
 
Grimstone said:
but from a insiders view?

From the insiders view, everything is normal, everything is moving at appears to be normal speed, light is still measured to be moving at c, and the little girl is running at normal little girl running speed.
 
Grimstone said:
but from a insiders view?

From an inside view the train is not moving at all, it is at rest. So the little girl would be running at 5-10 MPH.
 
Grimstone said:
C. the girls speed IS added to the trains but because time slowed down Even more? she can't hit C?
Correct; her speed is added to the train's, but non-linearly. I.e. v \neq v_\textrm{train} + v_\textrm{suzie}

Grimstone said:
Tomcat does mach2 fires a sidewinder that does mach2. for a short bit. that winder IS doing mach4.
The sidewinder would actually be going very (very very) close to mach 4, but not quite. At very small velocities, the effects of relativity are very (very very) small, and thus v \approx v_\textrm{tomcat} + v_\textrm{sidewinder}

Grimstone said:
so why is Suzie's speed not added to the trains and thus she is moving faster than the train.
The closer the velocities get to the speed of light the less effectively they add together.
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recombination_(cosmology) Was a matter density right after the decoupling low enough to consider the vacuum as the actual vacuum, and not the medium through which the light propagates with the speed lower than ##({\epsilon_0\mu_0})^{-1/2}##? I'm asking this in context of the calculation of the observable universe radius, where the time integral of the inverse of the scale factor is multiplied by the constant speed of light ##c##.
The formal paper is here. The Rutgers University news has published a story about an image being closely examined at their New Brunswick campus. Here is an excerpt: Computer modeling of the gravitational lens by Keeton and Eid showed that the four visible foreground galaxies causing the gravitational bending couldn’t explain the details of the five-image pattern. Only with the addition of a large, invisible mass, in this case, a dark matter halo, could the model match the observations...
Hi, I’m pretty new to cosmology and I’m trying to get my head around the Big Bang and the potential infinite extent of the universe as a whole. There’s lots of misleading info out there but this forum and a few others have helped me and I just wanted to check I have the right idea. The Big Bang was the creation of space and time. At this instant t=0 space was infinite in size but the scale factor was zero. I’m picturing it (hopefully correctly) like an excel spreadsheet with infinite...
Back
Top