Giving blood without the rubber?

  • Thread starter Thread starter munky99999
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Blood Rubber
AI Thread Summary
If the rubber tourniquet is not tied while the needle is in the arm, the blood flow may experience a slight reduction. The tourniquet compresses the veins, allowing them to expand and become more visible for easier needle insertion. Once the needle is in, the tourniquet can often be removed with minimal impact on blood collection. The primary function of the tourniquet is to temporarily halt blood flow back to the heart, which helps in locating the vein. Overall, not using the tourniquet can complicate the process of drawing blood effectively.
munky99999
Messages
200
Reaction score
0
What would happen if you didnt tie that rubber while the needle is in your arm gathering blood. Would it spray a lot faster or not at all?
 
Biology news on Phys.org
The rubber compresses the veins making the part before the rubber expand a bit and become easier to see.
This makes it easier to poke the needle into the vein without missing and without going completely through the vein(not a good thing).

After the needle is in the rubber can be removed with little effect and often is.
There will be a slight reduction in flow.
 
Well, it's not so much that it compresses the vein, it's that it stops the flow (veins carry blood BACK to the heart), causing the vein to plump up. But yeah, what he said.
 
Deadly cattle screwworm parasite found in US patient. What to know. https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/health/2025/08/25/new-world-screwworm-human-case/85813010007/ Exclusive: U.S. confirms nation's first travel-associated human screwworm case connected to Central American outbreak https://www.reuters.com/business/environment/us-confirms-nations-first-travel-associated-human-screwworm-case-connected-2025-08-25/...
Chagas disease, long considered only a threat abroad, is established in California and the Southern U.S. According to articles in the Los Angeles Times, "Chagas disease, long considered only a threat abroad, is established in California and the Southern U.S.", and "Kissing bugs bring deadly disease to California". LA Times requires a subscription. Related article -...
I am reading Nicholas Wade's book A Troublesome Inheritance. Please let's not make this thread a critique about the merits or demerits of the book. This thread is my attempt to understanding the evidence that Natural Selection in the human genome was recent and regional. On Page 103 of A Troublesome Inheritance, Wade writes the following: "The regional nature of selection was first made evident in a genomewide scan undertaken by Jonathan Pritchard, a population geneticist at the...

Similar threads

Back
Top