Gluons 101: Understanding the Force Carrier Particle of Strong Nuclear Force

  • Thread starter Thread starter Glenn
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gluons
Glenn
Is my understanding correct that gluons are the force carrier particle of the strong nuclear force?

Do gluons hold together quarks? Or do gluons hold together atomic nuclei?

Thanks,
Glenn
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Yes, your understanding is correct. Gluons are indeed the force carrier particle of the strong nuclear force. This means that they mediate the interaction between quarks, which are the fundamental building blocks of protons and neutrons. Without gluons, quarks would not be able to bind together to form these larger particles.

To answer your second question, gluons hold together quarks to form protons and neutrons, which in turn make up the atomic nuclei. So in a way, gluons do indirectly hold together atomic nuclei by keeping the quarks bound together.

I hope this helps clarify your understanding of gluons and their role in the strong nuclear force. Keep exploring and learning about the fascinating world of particle physics!
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top