Going from Spherical coordinates to Cartesian

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around converting spherical coordinates to Cartesian coordinates, specifically the point `(rho,theta,phi) = (6, (5pi)/4, pi/2)`. Participants are exploring the implications of different conventions used in spherical coordinate systems.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are examining the correctness of the conversion formulas used and questioning the conventions for angles in spherical coordinates. There is also discussion about the interpretation of negative values and the addition of angles.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with participants providing insights into potential discrepancies in conventions between mathematicians and engineers. Some guidance has been offered regarding the interpretation of the spherical coordinates, but no consensus has been reached on the correct approach or interpretation.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of an online homework system (WAMAP) and its potential influence on the answers provided. Participants are also considering the implications of using different conventions for angles in spherical coordinates.

the7joker7
Messages
111
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Convert the point `(rho,theta,phi) = (6, (5pi)/4, pi/2)` to Cartesian coordinates. Give answers as positive values, either as expressions, or decimals to one decimal place.

The Attempt at a Solution



{x}=r*sintheta*cosphi
{y}=r*sintheta*sinphi
{z}=r*costheta

So

x = 6*sin(5pi/4)*cos(pi/2)
y = 6*sin(5pi/4)*sin(pi/2)
z = 6*cos(5pi/4)

x = 0
y = -4.242640687 (+2pi)
z = -4.242640687 (+2pi)

What did I do wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Don't know. It looks reasonable so far. But you should be warned that mathematicians and physicists use different convention for the meaning of the angles in spherical coordinates. Are you sure you got the coordinate change from the same source as the problem? But I'm not sure what the (+2pi) is supposed to mean.
 
Because my answer is negative, don't I add 2pi to get the correct positive answer, as is the law of angles in this format?

FTR, here's the right answer.

`[(-4.24264068712,-4.24264068712,3.67381906147E-16)]`
 
the7joker7 said:
Because my answer is negative, don't I add 2pi to get the correct positive answer, as is the law of angles in this format?

FTR, here's the right answer.

`[(-4.24264068712,-4.24264068712,3.67381906147E-16)]`

Your answer is {x,y,z}. Those aren't angles. You can't add anything to them. Where did you get that 'answer'? I'm guessing because of the E-16 from some kind a 'calculator device'. Are you sure that is using the same conventions as the problem source?
 
Yeah, it's an online homework system. WAMAP.
 
Oh, great. I don't know what WAMAP means either. But from the -4.24264068712 and E-16 which should in any reasonable universe be written as '0', you weren't completely off.
 
Is this an engineering class or a mathematics class?

The reason I ask is that engineers swap "[itex]\theta[/itex]" and "[itex]\phi[/itex]" from what mathematicians use. Is [itex]\phi[/itex] the "co-latitude" and [itex]\theta[/itex] the "longitude" or vice-versa?
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
9K