Goldstein schodinger's equation Lagragian problem.

Peeter
Messages
303
Reaction score
3
Problem 3 in the continuous systems and fields chapter of (the first edition, 1956 printing) of Goldstein's classical mechanics has the following Lagrangian:

<br /> L = \frac{h^2}{8 \pi^2 m} \nabla \psi \cdot \nabla \psi^{*}<br /> + V \psi \psi^{*}<br /> + \frac{h}{2\pi i}<br /> ( \psi^{*} \dot{\psi}<br /> - \psi \dot{\psi}^{*} )<br />

The problem is to treat \psi and its conjugate as independent field variables and show that this generates Schodinger's equation and its conjugate.

Doing the problem I find I need h/4\pi i in this last term to make it work out. Could somebody with a newer edition of this text see if this is a corrected typo?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Still the same eq for the Lagrangian density.

I have third edition.
 
Does anybody see where I went wrong:

<br /> L <br /> = \frac{h^2}{8 \pi^2 m} \nabla \psi \cdot \nabla \psi^{*} + V \psi \psi^{*} + \frac{h}{2 \pi i} ( \psi^{*} \partial_t \psi - \psi \partial_t \psi^{*} )<br />
<br /> = \frac{h^2}{8 \pi^2 m} \partial_k \psi \partial_k \psi^{*} + V \psi \psi^{*} + <br /> \frac{h}{2 \pi i} ( \psi^{*} \partial_t \psi - \psi \partial_t \psi^{*} )<br />

We have
<br /> \frac{\partial L}{\partial \psi^{*} } = V\psi + \frac{h}{2 \pi i} \partial_t \psi<br />

and canonical momenta
<br /> \frac{\partial L}{\partial{(\partial_k \psi^{*})}} = \frac{h^2}{8 \pi^2 m} \partial_{k} \psi<br />
<br /> \frac{\partial L}{\partial{(\partial_t \psi^{*})}} = -\frac{h}{2 \pi i} {\psi}<br />

<br /> \frac{\partial L}{\partial \psi^{*}} = \sum_k \partial_k \frac{\partial L}{\partial{(\partial_k \psi^{*})}} + \partial_t \frac{\partial L}{\partial{(\partial_t \psi^{*})}}<br />
<br /> V\psi + \frac{h}{2 \pi i} \partial_t \psi = \frac{h^2}{8 \pi^2 m} \sum_k \partial_{kk} \psi -\frac{h}{2 \pi i} \frac{\partial \psi}{\partial{t}}<br />

which is off by a factor of two in the time term
<br /> -\frac{h^2}{8 \pi^2 m} \nabla^2 \psi + V\psi = \frac{h i}{\pi} \frac{\partial \psi}{\partial{t}}<br />
 
Peeter said:
Problem 3 in the continuous systems and fields chapter of (the first edition, 1956 printing) of Goldstein's classical mechanics has the following Lagrangian:

<br /> L = \frac{h^2}{8 \pi^2 m} \nabla \psi \cdot \nabla \psi^{*}<br /> + V \psi \psi^{*}<br /> + \frac{h}{2\pi i}<br /> ( \psi^{*} \dot{\psi}<br /> - \psi \dot{\psi}^{*} )<br />

The problem is to treat \psi and its conjugate as independent field variables and show that this generates Schodinger's equation and its conjugate.

Doing the problem I find I need h/4\pi i in this last term to make it work out. Could somebody with a newer edition of this text see if this is a corrected typo?

You are right. I remember this "typo"! I wonder why it has not been corrected after all these years?
The 1/2 factor is necessary when working with Hermitian Lagrangians like the one you wrote. Non-hermitian Lagrangian on the other hand does not need the 1/2, but does the same job;

\mathcal{L} = i \hbar \psi^{*}\partial_{t}\psi - \frac{\hbar^{2}}{2m} \partial_{i}\psi^{*}\partial_{i}\psi - V(x) \psi^{*}\psi

regards

sam
 
Thanks Sam.

Malawi,

What page and chapter is this problem in, in the third edition?

EDIT: fyi. I reported the problem and got the following response:

> I looked in the 1st, 4th and 6th printings of the 3rd edition. The problem appears on page 599 (#4). The correction you sent was made before the 1st printing since the 1/4 appears on page 599 of all printings.
 
Last edited:
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top