Gonna be away from physics for 1 year

  • Thread starter Thread starter iRaid
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Physics Year
AI Thread Summary
Taking AP Physics B in high school without the option for AP Physics C raises concerns about retaining knowledge during a year-long break from physics. It's noted that while some knowledge may fade over time, it typically comes back quickly upon review, especially after a year. The discussion emphasizes that taking AP Calculus AB alongside physics will provide relevant problem-solving skills that can help bridge the gap. Self-studying calculus before the class is generally discouraged, as foundational learning is crucial for understanding advanced concepts. Instead, focusing on the class and then using self-study materials closer to the AP exam is recommended. Additionally, there are suggestions to explore dual-enrollment options with local colleges for further enrichment. Lastly, many high school calculus courses cover sufficient material to prepare students for college-level calculus, making it beneficial to discuss advanced options with teachers.
iRaid
Messages
558
Reaction score
8
Well here is my problem.. I decided I would take AP Physics B (trig/algebra based) in my junior year of high school. My high school doesn't have AP Physics C so I will essentially be without physics for a year (until college). During that time I feel like I'll lose a lot of knowledge. Any suggestions of what to do or has anyone taken an extended break from physics before? Do you get your "knowledge" back after time or what :p?
Also, I will be taking AP calc AB (Calc I) so I was wondering if I should buy a book and self-study, if so what book.

Thanks for reading.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Do you have some sort of dual-enrollment program with your local university or community college?
 
I took a break from Physics for 7 years after high school, and while you obviously forget things, when you revise them, it comes back to you fairly quickly. So don't sweat it, especially over merely a year.
 
I think you'll be fine with the year off of Physics - esspecially since you're taking Calculus (which will have a lot of physics-related story problems). Once you get to University, if you're going into any field where Physics is importaint, you'll be taking a Calc-based Physics anyhow. Much of the specifics you learned from the AP-Physics B class will likely be irrelevant as you'll learn new techniques to solve the problems.

As for self-studying Calc I - I wouldn't suggest it (if you're going to take the class). There is a lot of foundational learning that is done with Calculus at all levels and each of the building blocks, in order, are very importaint. Getting ahead of yourself will ruin some of those 'ah ha!' moments that makes math fun ;) Once you get closer to the AP test, look for a self-study book to use as review for the AP test.

Take this for what it's worth, as your mileage may vary (As your school may not fit this mold), but many High School Calculus classes cover nearly enough to prepare students for the Calc BC test (which will be good for a college level Calc II). I only took the AB test out of school, and was deathly bored in my University Calc II as 3/4 of it was review from high school. Talk with your teacher about making work towards the BC test (probably starting after Christmas) if you're really wanting to do something extra Math related.
 
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...

Similar threads

Replies
22
Views
6K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
32
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
43
Views
7K
Back
Top